课题基金 / 基金详情

项目摘要

项目成果

BENJAMIN S ABELLA的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
描述(由申请人提供):及时进行心肺复苏(CPR)可使心脏骤停(SCA)的存活率提高2-3倍,但大多数旁观者目睹的受害者仍然在没有进行初步CPR尝试的情况下死亡。在我们对如何向高危人群传播心肺复苏术培训的理解方面存在着严重的知识差距。这一点很重要,因为心肺复苏术是极少数可用于提高SCA生存率的工具之一,每年美国有超过20万人受到SCA的影响。冠心病患者发生SCA的风险显著增加,超过75%的SCA事件发生在家庭环境中。总之,这两个观察结果突出了通过针对因冠状动脉疾病并发症住院患者的家庭成员(特别是配偶)进行CPR培训来影响心血管健康的机会。目前的心肺复苏术培训实施在很大程度上未能达到这一风险人口。简化心肺复苏术教育并由此扩大和增加培训的尝试已经导致了“仅用手”的心肺复苏术的发展,省略了口对口通气的需要。然而,广泛实施的首选战略尚不清楚。我们工作的长期目标是为“真实的世界”心肺复苏术传播建立最佳实践,使培训场所与高危人群相匹配,最大限度地保留复苏技能,并促进行动意愿。为此,本申请的目标是使用最近验证的视频自我指导(VSI)CPR程序在基于医院的实施方案中测试两种CPR教育策略。我们的中心假设是,在这种高度积极的高危人群中,与标准CPR相比,仅用手的CPR培训将提高技能保留率,并解决重要的培训障碍。作为一个传播项目,将给予每个医院的当地利益相关者高度的自主权,以调整每个地点的工作人员和招生办法,一个重要的目标是学习他们的实施经验。为了检验我们的中心假设,我们将在8家医院队列中追求以下特定目标:(1)评估随机接受仅手VSI CPR培训与标准VSI CPR培训的受试者在3个月时复苏技能保持的客观指标。(2)使用混合定量和定性调查方法,在我们基于医院的模型中测量感知的CPR培训入学障碍和动机,以及(3)分析我们的VSI CPR教育计划的成本,并执行预算影响分析,比较具体目标1中的两种CPR策略,即员工机会成本和每个受试者的成本,并充分保留技能作为成本建模输入。我们的调查团队是独一无二的准备完成这项工作,其长期专注于临床心肺复苏术研究和心肺复苏术教育的合作记录。这种创新的方法,通过医院平台和VSI的使用,将心肺复苏术培训与公众需求相匹配,可以作为向高度积极性的人群传播救生心肺复苏术技能的国家模式。
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Prompt delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) by 2-3 fold, yet most bystander-witnessed victims still die without an initial CPR attempt. There is a critical knowledge gap in our understanding of how to disseminate CPR training to at-risk populations. This is important as CPR delivery represents one of very few tools available to improve survival from SCA, which afflicts over 200,000 people in the United States each year. Individuals with coronary disease are at significantly increased risk of SCA, and greater than 75% of SCA events occur in the home environment. Taken together, these two observations highlight the opportunity to impact cardiovascular health by targeting CPR training to family members (and especially spouses) of patients hospitalized for complications of coronary disease. Current CPR training implementation largely fails to reach this at-risk demographic. Attempts to simplify CPR education and thereby broaden and increase training have led to the development of "hands- only" CPR, omitting the need for mouth-to-mouth ventilation. However, the preferred strategy for broad implementation is unknown. The long term goal of our work is to establish best practices for "real world" CPR dissemination that match training venues with at-risk populations, maximize resuscitation skill retention, and promote willingness to act. Towards this end, the goal of this application is to test two CPR educational strategies using a recently validated video-self instruction (VSI) CPR program in a hospital-based implementation program. Our central hypothesis is that hands-only CPR training will yield improved skills retention and address important training barriers when compared to standard CPR in this highly motivated at- risk population. As a dissemination project, a high degree of autonomy will be given to local stakeholders at each hospital to tailor the staff and enrollment approach at each site, and an important objective will be to learn from their implementation experiences. To test our central hypothesis, we will pursue the following Specific Aims in an eight hospital cohort: (1) Assess objective metrics of resuscitation skill retention at three months in subjects randomized to hands-only VSI CPR training versus standard VSI CPR. (2) Measure the perceived barriers and motivations to enrollment for CPR training in our hospital-based model using mixed quantitative and qualitative survey methods, and (3) Analyze the costs of our VSI CPR educational program, and perform a budget impact analysis comparing the two CPR strategies in Specific Aim 1 with regard to the staff opportunity costs and cost per subject with adequately retained skills as cost modeling inputs. Our investigative team is uniquely poised to accomplish this work, with its longstanding focus on clinical CPR research and track record of collaboration in CPR education. This innovative approach, to match CPR training with public need via the hospital platform and the use of VSI, may serve as a national model for dissemination of lifesaving CPR skills to a highly motivated population.
期刊论文(6)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1177/1740774516643265
发表时间: 2016-08
期刊: Clinical trials (London, England)
影响因子: --
作者: [Blewer AL, Li J, Ikeda DJ, Leary M, Buckler DG, Riegel B, Desai S, Groeneveld PW, Putt ME, Abella BS]
通讯作者: Abella BS
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318236f2ca
发表时间: 2012-03
期刊: Critical care medicine
影响因子: 8.8
作者: [Blewer AL, Leary M, Esposito EC, Gonzalez M, Riegel B, Bobrow BJ, Abella BS]
通讯作者: Abella BS
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.016
发表时间: 2016-03
期刊: Resuscitation
影响因子: 6.5
作者: [Ikeda DJ, Buckler DG, Li J, Agarwal AK, Di Taranti LJ, Kurtz J, Reis RD, Leary M, Abella BS, Blewer AL]
通讯作者: Blewer AL
DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.116.002493
发表时间: 2016-11
期刊: Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
影响因子: --
作者: [Blewer AL, Putt ME, Becker LB, Riegel BJ, Li J, Leary M, Shea JA, Kirkpatrick JN, Berg RA, Nadkarni VM, Groeneveld PW, Abella BS, CHIP Study Group*]
通讯作者: CHIP Study Group*
Evaluating the impact of PHLHousing+ on reducing health disparities
  • 批准号:
    10835178
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $36.56万
  • 财政年份:
    2023
  • 负责人:
    BENJAMIN S ABELLA
  • 依托单位:
Implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for at-risk families
  • 批准号:
    8322008
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $55.78万
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 负责人:
    BENJAMIN S ABELLA
  • 依托单位:
Implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for at-risk families
  • 批准号:
    8514416
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $55.76万
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 负责人:
    BENJAMIN S ABELLA
  • 依托单位:
Implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for at-risk families
  • 批准号:
    8077803
  • 项目类别:
  • 资助金额:
    $55.91万
  • 财政年份:
    2011
  • 负责人:
    BENJAMIN S ABELLA
  • 依托单位:
海外基金