Enhancing Clinical Guideline Development via Patient and Stakeholder Engagement

通过患者和利益相关者的参与加强临床指南的制定

• 批准号: 8951631
• 负责人: Melissa Jo Armstrong
• 金额: $ 2.96万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2015-07-01 至 2015-08-15
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8951631
• 关键词: Enhancing; Clinical; Guideline; Development; via

 DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): This AHRQ Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08) is designed to provide the Principal Investigator, Dr. Melissa Armstrong, with the training and skills needed for an independent career in health services research focusing on improving the clinical practice guideline (CPG) development process through patient engagement. The proposed research investigates the impact of patient, family, and advocate involvement on developing CPG questions. The inclusion of patients and stakeholders in guideline development is now recommended practice. Despite this, the effect of patient and stakeholder involvement on guidelines remains unknown. The study aims are to: (1) investigate the effect of patient, family, and advocate involvement on guideline question formation by comparing results of guideline development groups (GDGs) with and without their involvement, (2) compare importance ratings between patients, families, advocates, and content experts for each element of the proposed guideline questions, and (3) identify the effect of patients/families/advocates (Aim #1) and importance scores (Aim #2) on final consensus guideline questions. The proposed research is based on the PI's neurological expertise and will make use of an upcoming American Academy of Neurology guideline project regarding the use of beta-amyloid imaging in patients with - or at risk for - dementia. Two GDGs will be convened to develop the guideline questions: a "control" (routine practice) GDG of health care professionals (HCPs) alone and an "experimental" GDG including HCPs and patients, family, and advocates. Differences in guideline questions and analytic frameworks will be analyzed qualitatively. For Aim #2, patients, family, advocates, and HCPs/content experts will rate the importance of each component of the guideline questions (e.g. relevant outcomes) on a 9-point ordinal scale. Three levels of patient/family/advocate and HCP ratings will be surveyed: those on the GDGs, those participating in online public comment, and via survey of the larger population. Differences in importance ratings will be compared using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests. For Aim #3, a qualitative analysis will compare the final consensus CPG questions to the questions posed in Aim #1. To achieve these aims, Dr. Armstrong will use mentored skills including training in patient engagement, patient-centered outcomes research, qualitative methods, and dissemination/implementation strategies. Investigating the effect of patient, family, and advocate involvement on CPGs is critical in order to address important healthcare questions such as whether guideline developers miss key questions by excluding these stakeholders, whether guidelines are addressing health outcomes of importance to patients, and whether variable stakeholder engagement explains CPG inconsistencies. The knowledge gained from this study will further the ultimate goal of understanding whether patient engagement facilitates CPG acceptance and implementation by end-users in order to enhance provision of evidence-based and personalized healthcare for millions of Americans with chronic disease.

 描述（由申请人提供）：该AHRQ指导临床科学家研究职业发展奖（K 08）旨在为主要研究者Melissa Armstrong博士提供卫生服务研究独立职业所需的培训和技能，重点是通过患者参与改善临床实践指南（CPG）开发过程。拟议的研究调查的影响，病人，家属和倡导参与制定CPG的问题。现在建议将患者和利益相关者纳入指南制定中。尽管如此，患者和利益相关者参与对指南的影响仍然未知。研究的目的是：（1）通过比较有和没有患者、家属和倡导者参与的指南开发组（GDG）的结果，调查患者、家属和倡导者参与对指南问题形成的影响，（2）比较患者、家属、倡导者和内容专家对所提议的指南问题的每个元素的重要性评级，以及（3）确定患者/家属/倡导者（目标#1）和重要性评分（目标#2）对最终共识指南问题的影响。 这项拟议的研究是基于PI的神经学专业知识，并将利用即将到来的美国神经病学学会关于在痴呆症患者或有痴呆风险的患者中使用β-淀粉样蛋白成像的指导项目。将召集两个GDG制定指南问题：一个是医疗保健专业人员（HCP）的“对照”（常规实践）GDG，另一个是包括HCP和患者、家属和倡导者的“实验性”GDG。将对指导问题和分析框架的差异进行定性分析。对于目标#2，患者、家属、倡导者和HCP/内容专家将在9分顺序量表上对指南问题的每个组成部分（例如相关结局）的重要性进行评级。将调查三个级别的患者/家庭/倡导者和HCP评级：GDG上的评级、参与在线公众评论的评级以及通过对更大人群的调查。将使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较重要性评级的差异。对于目标3，定性分析将比较最终共识CPG问题与目标1中提出的问题。为了实现这些目标，阿姆斯特朗博士将使用指导技能，包括患者参与培训，以患者为中心的结果研究，定性方法和传播/实施策略。调查患者，家属和倡导者参与对CPG的影响至关重要，以便解决重要的医疗保健问题，例如指南开发人员是否因排除这些利益相关者而错过了关键问题，指南是否解决了对患者重要的健康结果，以及可变利益相关者参与是否解释了CPG的不一致性。从这项研究中获得的知识将进一步了解患者参与是否有助于最终用户接受和实施CPG的最终目标，以加强为数百万患有慢性病的美国人提供循证和个性化的医疗保健。