Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring to Improve Hypertension Control in a Primary Care Network

实施远程患者监测以改善初级保健网络中的高血压控制

• 批准号: 10649460
• 负责人: Ian Matthew Kronish
• 金额: $ 70.78万
• 依托单位: COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2021
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2021-06-15 至 2026-05-31
• 项目状态: 未结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10649460
• 关键词: Acceleration; Address; Adherence; African American; Age; Ambulatory Care; American Medical Association; Blood; Blood Pressure; Blood Pressure Monitors; COVID-19 pandemic; Calendar; Caring; Chronic Disease; Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Clinic; Clinic Visits; Clinical; Clinical effectiveness; Cluster randomized trial; Code; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Cost Analysis; Data; Early Intervention; Economics; Effectiveness of Interventions; Feedback; Fostering; Goals; Guidelines; Health Care Costs; Health system; Healthcare Systems; Heart; Heart failure; Hispanic; Hispanic Populations; Home; Hybrids; Hypertension; Intervention; Interview; Knowledge; Low income; Lung; Marketing; Measurement; Measures; Medicaid; Modeling; Monitor; New York; New York City; Nurses; Outcome; Patient Care; Patient Monitoring; Patients; Persons; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Presbyterian Church; Primary Care; Process; Provider; Public Health; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized; Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance; Recommendation; Regimen; Remote management; System; Team Nursing; Telemedicine; Titrations; Training; Translations; Uncertainty; United States; Use Effectiveness; Waiting Lists; Work; behavior change wheel; blood pressure control; blood pressure elevation; blood pressure medication; budget impact; cost; cost effective; cost effectiveness; design; effectiveness outcome; effectiveness/implementation design; evidence based guidelines; human centered design; hypertension control; hypertensive; implementation evaluation; implementation outcomes; implementation strategy; improved; innovation; models and simulation; patient engagement; patient population; pilot test; post implementation; pragmatic trial; primary care clinic; programs; remote patient monitoring; socioeconomics; systematic review; telemonitoring; theories; treatment as usual; trend; trial design; uptake

SUMMARY Based on evidence from multiple systematic reviews, hypertension guidelines strongly recommend that hypertensive patients measure their blood pressure (BP) at home as an approach to improving BP control so long as this self-measured BP monitoring (SMBP) is conducted with clinical support (i.e., Supported SMBP). Pragmatic trials demonstrate that Supported SMBP increases opportunities for medication titrations, increases BP medication regimen intensity and adherence, and ultimately, improves BP control. Yet, few health systems are systematically implementing Supported SMBP, and less than 20% of hypertensive patients routinely measure their BP at home, resulting in a gap in the translation of evidence-based recommendations into practice. This gap is driven by lack of knowledge regarding how best to implement Supported SMBP to maximize uptake by patients and providers at an acceptable health system cost. In partnership with leaders at New York-Presbyterian (NYP), we developed a nurse-supported SMBP intervention in which a centralized team of nurses is responsible for engaging patients in SMBP, monitoring SMBP data, and providing feedback on HTN control to patients and providers . We next followed a theory- driven process (the Behavior Change Wheel) to select an implementation strategy aimed at increasing uptake of Supported SMBP. We identified telemonitoring as a key implementation strategy. We then pilot tested this intervention and implementation strategy at one clinic and found moderate uptake and promising trends in BP control, but there was still a need to improve the implementation strategy. Few if any studies have assessed the systematic implementation of Supported SMBP in primary care, particularly in low-income settings. We now propose to apply human-centered design to refine our implementation strategy, and then implement and evaluate the Supported SMBP intervention across a primary care network (12 clinics) that provides care to socioeconomically diverse patients (27,600 HTN patients, 35% with uncontrolled BP). We will evaluate the program by conducting a parallel-group cluster randomized trial in which clinics will be randomly assigned to early (intervention) versus delayed (wait-list control) implementation of the telemonitoring-enabled, nurse- supported SMBP intervention. The primary clinical effectiveness outcome will be pre-to-post implementation change in the clinic mean of patients' last systolic BP during a 12-month calendar period. The impact of the implementation strategy will be assessed by measuring uptake of Supported SMBP by patients and providers and by interviewing patients and providers to assess key implementation outcomes (acceptability, fidelity). To inform dissemination, the cost-effectiveness of the intervention from a health system and total healthcare cost perspective will also be assessed. If successful, our project will provide a roadmap for widely implementing SMBP, and will accelerate a change in the paradigm of hypertension management from the clinic to the home.

概括 根据多项系统评价的证据，高血压指南强烈建议： 高血压患者在家测量血压 (BP)，作为改善血压控制的一种方法，以便 只要这种自我测量血压监测 (SMBP) 是在临床支持下进行的（即支持的 SMBP）。 务实试验表明，受支持的 SMBP 增加了药物滴定的机会， 血压药物治疗方案的强度和依从性，最终改善血压控制。然而，很少有卫生系统 正在系统地实施受支持的SMBP，只有不到20%的高血压患者常规实施 在家测量血压，导致将循证建议转化为血压方面存在差距 实践。造成这种差距的原因是缺乏关于如何最好地实施受支持的SMBP以 以可接受的卫生系统成本最大限度地提高患者和提供者的吸收率。 我们与纽约长老会 (NYP) 的领导者合作，开发了护士支持的 SMBP 干预其中 一个集中的护士团队负责让患者参与 SMBP、监测 SMBP 数据，并向患者和提供者提供有关高血压控制的反馈 。接下来我们遵循一个理论—— 驱动流程（行为改变轮）选择旨在提高采用率的实施策略 支持的SMBP。我们将远程监控确定为一项关键实施策略。然后我们对此进行了试点测试 一家诊所的干预和实施策略，发现血压的适度采用和有希望的趋势 但实施策略仍需完善。很少有研究评估过 在初级保健中系统地实施受支持的SMBP，特别是在低收入环境中。 我们现在建议应用以人为本的设计来细化我们的实施策略，然后实施 并评估整个初级保健网络（12 个诊所）所支持的 SMBP 干预措施，该网络为以下人群提供护理 社会经济多样化的患者（27,600 名高血压患者，35% 血压未受控制）。我们将评估 通过进行平行组群随机试验来进行计划，其中诊所将被随机分配 尽早（干预）与延迟（等候名单控制）实施远程监控、护士 支持SMBP干预。主要临床效果结果将在实施前后进行 12 个月日历期内患者最后一次收缩压的临床平均值的变化。的影响 将通过测量患者和提供者对支持的SMBP的吸收来评估实施策略 并通过采访患者和提供者来评估关键的实施结果（可接受性、保真度）。到 告知传播、卫生系统干预措施的成本效益和总医疗保健成本 还将评估观点。如果成功，我们的项目将为广泛实施提供路线图 SMBP，将加速高血压管理模式从诊所到家庭的转变。

项目成果

Discontinuation of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

在 COVID-19 大流行的早期阶段停用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂。

• DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpad027
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: American journal of hypertension
• 影响因子: 3.2
• 作者: Muntner,Paul;Foti,Kathryn;Wang,Zhixin;Alanaeme,ChibuikeJ;Choi,Eunhee;Bress,AdamP;Shimbo,Daichi;Kronish,Ian
• 通讯作者: Kronish,Ian

A Multifaceted Implementation Strategy to Increase Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring: The EMBRACE Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

• DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34646
• 发表时间: 2023-09-05
• 期刊: JAMA NETWORK OPEN
• 影响因子: 13.8
• 作者: Kronish, Ian M.;Phillips, Erica;Alcantara, Carmela;Carter, Eileen;Schwartz, Joseph E.;Shimbo, Daichi;Serafini, Maria;Boyd, Rebekah;Chang, Melinda;Wang, Xiaohui;Razon, Dominic;Patel, Akash;Moise, Nathalie
• 通讯作者: Moise, Nathalie

Association between telemedicine use and diabetes risk factor assessment and control in a primary care network.

• DOI: 10.1007/s40618-022-01814-6
• 发表时间: 2022-09
• 期刊: JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
• 影响因子: 5.4
• 作者: Grauer, A.;Duran, A. T.;Liyanage-Don, N. A.;Torres-Deas, L. M.;Metser, G.;Moise, N.;Kronish, I. M.;Ye, S.
• 通讯作者: Ye, S.

Psychological Distress and Hypertension Diagnostic Testing: Is There Anything to Worry About?

心理困扰和高血压诊断测试：有什么值得担心的吗？

• DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpad096
• 发表时间: 2024
• 期刊: American journal of hypertension
• 影响因子: 3.2
• 作者: Särnholm,Josefin;Kronish,IanM
• 通讯作者: Kronish,IanM