Telephone Counseling: Men w/Prostate CA & Partners

电话咨询：患有前列腺癌的男性

• 批准号: 7286822
• 负责人: Terry A Badger
• 金额: $ 10.96万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2006
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2006-09-11 至 2010-02-28
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/7286822
• 关键词: Adherence; Affect; Age; Am 80; Anxiety; Behavioral Research; Cancer Family; Cancer Patient; Cancer Survivor; Caring; Characteristics; Clinical Trials; Communication; Counseling; Cultural Backgrounds; Data; Development; Disease; Distress; Dose; Education; Effectiveness; Effectiveness of Interventions; Enrollment; Ethnic Origin; Experimental Designs; Extended Family; Fatigue; Goals; Grant; Hispanics; Individual; Intervention; Malignant Neoplasms; Malignant neoplasm of prostate; Measurement; Measures; Mental Depression; Modeling; National Cancer Institute; National Institute of Nursing Research; Not Hispanic or Latino; Outcome; Personal Satisfaction; Persons; Phase; Pilot Projects; Population; Purpose; Quality of life; Randomized; Regression Analysis; Rehabilitation therapy; Research; Sampling; Series; Social Well-Being; Social support; Staging; Stress; Symptoms; Telephone; Testing; Time; Week; Well in self; Woman; compare effectiveness; depressive symptoms; design; desire; improved; innovation; insight; malignant breast neoplasm; men; programs; psychologic; psychosocial; response; size; social; statistics; symptom management

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): The purpose of this pilot study is to test a telephone-delivered interpersonal counseling intervention compared to an attentional usual care control on the effects of quality of life (physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being) for 80 men with prostate cancer and their partners. Aim 1 will examine the effectiveness of the telephone interpersonal counseling intervention (TIP-C) compared to an attentional usual care control (UC) with men with prostate cancer and their partners' a) Physical well-being (fatigue, symptom distress and symptom management) b) Psychological well-being (depression, anxiety, and stress), c) Social Well-being (relationship quality) and d) Spiritual Well-Being. Aim 2 will describe the demographic (e.g., age, ethnicity) and social profiles of those individuals (person with cancer and partner) who respond positively to the TIP-C intervention, (e.g.. decreased symptoms of depression, negative affect, stress, anxiety, fatigue, and symptom distress and increased social well-being, symptom management, relationship quality and spiritual well-being). The third aim focuses on feasibility issues (i.e., to resolve any logistical issues of the telephone-delivered interventions). Aim 4 examines relevant methodological issues (i.e., determining the effect size differences for each intervention, dose- response associated with treatment strength, level of adherence needed for the desired outcomes). This study will use a randomized, stratified experimental design with repeated measures to compare the effectiveness of an 8 week TIP-C intervention with an 8-week UC on QOL indicators. About 80 white, non- Hispanic and Hispanic men with prostate cancer and their partners (N=160) will be assigned to either the TIP-C or UC, stratified by stage (IA to IV). Measurement will occur five times: At baseline upon enrollment (T1), after completing three weeks of the interventions (T2), after completing 6 weeks of the interventions (T3), after completing the 8-week interventions (T4) and two months after T4 (T5) for all subjects, regardless of group assignment. Data will be analyzed through descriptive statistics, a series of two-way mixed design ANOVAs and individual regression analyses.

描述（由申请人提供）：这项试点研究的目的是与注意生活质量（身体，心理，社会和精神健康）对80名患有前列腺癌及其伴侣的生活质量的影响（身体，心理，社会和精神健康）相比，测试了电话交付的人际咨询干预措施。 AIM 1将检查电话际交往咨询干预（TIP-C）的有效性与患有前列腺癌及其伴侣的男性的注意力常规护理控制（UC）相比，a）身体健康（疲劳，症状困扰和症状管理）b）心理健康福祉（抑郁，焦虑和压力）（抑郁，焦虑和压力），c），c），c）社会健康（关系质量）和decte and bey bey and decle and de and decle and decle and decle and de and de and de and decle and d）。 AIM 2将描述那些对TIP-C干预良好反应的人（例如，患有癌症和伴侣的人）的人口统计学（例如，年龄，种族）和社会概况（例如，抑郁症的症状减轻，负面影响，压力，焦虑，焦虑，疲劳和症状障碍和增加的社会福祉，症状管理，人际关系质量和精神福祉）。第三个目标侧重于可行性问题（即解决电话分配干预措施的任何后勤问题）。 AIM 4检查了相关的方法论问题（即确定每种干预措施的效果大小差异，与治疗强度相关的剂量反应，所需结果所需的依从性水平）。这项研究将使用重复测量的随机，分层的实验设计，以比较8周的TIP-C干预与QOL指标上的8周UC的有效性。大约80名白人，非西班牙裔和西班牙裔男子患有前列腺癌及其伴侣（n = 160），将分配给TIP-C或UC，分为阶段（IA至IV）。测量将进行五次：在入学时（T1），完成干预措施三周后（T2），完成干预措施6周后（T3）（T3），完成为期8周（T4）后，在所有受试者完成第8周（T4）之后，无论小组分配后，T4（T4）（T4）（T5）（T5）（T5）后，将进行五次。数据将通过描述性统计数据进行分析，这是一系列双向混合设计方差分析和单个回归分析。

项目成果

Psychological distress in different social network members of breast and prostate cancer survivors.

• DOI: 10.1002/nur.20394
• 发表时间: 2010-10
• 期刊: RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH
• 影响因子: 2
• 作者: Segrin, Chris;Badger, Terry A.
• 通讯作者: Badger, Terry A.

Psychosocial interventions to improve quality of life in prostate cancer survivors and their intimate or family partners.

• DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9822-2
• 发表时间: 2011-08
• 期刊: QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
• 影响因子: 3.5
• 作者: Badger, Terry A.;Segrin, Chris;Figueredo, Aurelio J.;Harrington, Joanne;Sheppard, Kate;Passalacqua, Stacey;Pasvogel, Alice;Bishop, Maria
• 通讯作者: Bishop, Maria

Interdependent psychological quality of life in dyads adjusting to prostate cancer.

• DOI: 10.1037/a0025394
• 发表时间: 2012-01
• 期刊: Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association
• 作者: Segrin C;Badger TA;Harrington J
• 通讯作者: Harrington J

Who benefits from a psychosocial counselling versus educational intervention to improve psychological quality of life in prostate cancer survivors?

• DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2012.731058
• 发表时间: 2013
• 期刊: Psychology & health
• 影响因子: 3.3
• 作者: Badger TA;Segrin C;Figueredo AJ;Harrington J;Sheppard K;Passalacqua S;Pasvogel A;Bishop M
• 通讯作者: Bishop M