Risk factors for psychopathology

描述(由申请人提供)：系统正当性理论提出，个人发展信仰系统，以解释和合法化社会中群体之间现有的地位差异。尽管人们在支持系统正当性信念的程度上存在差异，但研究表明，这些信念得到了广泛的认可，并对心理健康有重要影响。特别是，最近的研究发现，系统正当性与低地位群体成员的精神障碍有关。然而，目前的研究局限于对大学样本的研究和横断面研究方法的使用。这项应用的长期目标是通过检查低收入种族/民族少数群体和新移民中作为精神疾病风险因素的系统正当性，纵向探索关系，研究母体制度正当性与心理健康和儿童行为问题之间的联系，来扩展当前关于制度正当性的研究。目前的项目由两项研究组成，依赖于纽约大学文化、发展和教育研究中心(CRCDE)的数据，这三项研究具有许多优势。首先，样本由200名最近在纽约市分娩的低收入、移民和种族多元化的女性组成。其次，对母亲和她们的婴儿进行三年多的纵向跟踪，并使用经过充分验证的母亲精神障碍和儿童行为问题的流行病学筛查工具进行评估。第三，CRCDE将定量调查措施与对调查成员的随机抽样进行的内嵌定性研究相结合，允许对结构之间的关系有更细微的了解。第一项研究以调查数据为重点，使用基于回归的变化分数分析和结构方程建模技术来探索母系正当性、母体精神疾病和儿童行为问题之间的纵向联系。我假设，系统的合理性将与母亲患精神疾病和儿童行为问题的风险呈正相关。第二项研究采用混合方法，将调查和定性数据相结合，探索不同低收入女性认可的制度正当化信念的类型，并确定缓解或加剧制度正当性、母亲精神障碍和儿童行为问题之间关系的因素。拟议的项目对公共卫生有直接影响。系统理由可能是一个重要的以前未确定的风险因素，使母亲和她们的孩子面临精神障碍和行为问题的风险。了解系统正当性在心理健康中的作用，可以为旨在改善美国弱势群体心理健康的政策和干预努力提供信息。

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): System justification theory proposes that individuals develop belief systems to explain and legitimize existing status differences between groups in societies. Although people differ in the extent to which they endorse system-justifying beliefs, research shows they are widely endorsed and have important implications for mental health. In particular, recent research has found that system justification is related to mental disorders among members of low-status groups. However, the current research is limited by its focus on college samples and use of cross-sectional methods. The long-term objective of this application is to extend the current research on system justification by examining system justification as a risk factor for mental illness among low-income racial/ethnic minorities and recent immigrants, exploring relationships longitudinally and studying associations between maternal system justification and mental health and child behavior problems. The current project, comprised of two studies, relies on data from NYU's Center for Research on Culture, Development and Education (CRCDE), which have a number of advantages. First, the sample is composed of 200 low-income, immigrant and ethnically diverse women who recently gave birth in New York City. Second, mothers and their infants are followed longitudinally over three years and assessed using well- validated epidemiological screening tools for maternal mental disorders and child behavior problems. Third, the CRCDE combines quantitative survey measures with an embedded qualitative study of a random sample of survey members, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of relationships between constructs. The first study, focused on survey data, employs regression-based change score analyses and structural equation modeling techniques to explore longitudinal associations between maternal system justification, maternal mental illness and child behavior problems. I hypothesize that system justification will be positively related to maternal risk for mental illness and child behavior problems. The second study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining survey and qualitative data to explore the types of system- justifying beliefs endorsed by diverse low-income women, and identify factors that mitigate or exacerbate the relationship between system justification, maternal mental disorders and child behavior problems. The proposed project has direct implications for public health. System justification may be an important previously unidentified risk factor placing mothers and their children at risk for mental disorders and behavior problems. Understanding the role of system justification in mental health can inform policy and intervention efforts aimed at improving the mental health of vulnerable groups in the US.