Alignment of Treatment Preferences and Repair Type for Veterans with AAA
Alignment of Treatment Preferences and Repair Type for Veterans with AAA
批准号:
10016116
负责人:
Philip P Goodney
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017-05-01 至 2021-04-30
关键词:
Abdominal Aortic AneurysmAgreementAortic AneurysmBlood VesselsCaliberClient satisfactionClinicClinic VisitsCluster randomized trialConsentControl GroupsDecision AidEnrollmentEnsureFutureGoalsGrowthHealth PersonnelHospitalsIndividualInterventionKnowledgeLength of StayMeasuresMedical centerMethodsOffice SurgeryOperative Surgical ProceduresPainPatientsPostoperative PeriodPrincipal InvestigatorQualitative MethodsRecoveryReportingResearch DesignRiskRuptureRuptured AneurysmSiteSurgeonSurveysUncertaintyVariantVeteransVisitWorkanxiousbasecognitive interviewcohortdisabilityfollow-upinstrumentperioperative morbidityperioperative mortalitypreferenceprimary outcomerandomized trialrecruitrepairedsatisfactionscreeningsecondary outcomeshared decision makingtreatment centertreatment choicetrial comparing
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Nearly 5,000 Veterans undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair each year in VA hospitals.
Randomized trials, including the VA-based Open Versus Endovascular Repair (OVER) Trial, have found
endovascular AAA repair (EVAR), is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality, less pain, and
shorter length of stay than open surgical repair (OSR) However, OSR is more durable, has fewer long-term
complications such as late rupture, and Veterans treated with EVAR and OSR have similar survival within two
years following surgery. Given these tradeoffs, controversy remains as to which method is best suited for an
individual Veteran who AAA repair, and preliminary analyses needs have found broad variations across VA
hospitals in how Veterans are treated for AAA. Treatment decisions for AAA need to be aligned with Veterans'
preferences. For example, a Veteran for whom a rapid recovery is of primary importance and long-term
durability a lesser concern has a treatment preference which aligns most closely with EVAR. Similarly, a
Veteran who wishes to avoid repeated follow-up visits and late re-interventions has a treatment preference that
aligns most closely with OSR. However, while AAA treatment type varies across VA hospitals, it is unknown if
these treatment variations occurs as a result of Veterans preferences, or independent of Veterans'
preferences. Surgeon preferences for repair type have been poorly described, especially for surgeons treating
Veterans.
In preliminary work, we have performed observational analyses, surveys, and cognitive interviews. This works
has demonstrated variation in AAA repair type in VA and refined qualitative methods to better understand
Veterans' and surgeons’ treatment decisions. In this proposal, in a cohort of Veterans who are candidates for
either repair type (OSR or EVAR), we will use a survey explore Veterans' knowledge and preferences for AAA
repair, and determine if Veterans who receive a decision aid as well as the survey are more likely to receive
their treatment choice.
We describe a cluster-randomized trial comparing two ways to better align Veterans' preferences and
treatments for AAA: (1) a validated decision aid describing AAA repair types with a survey measuring Veterans'
preference for repair type -- versus (2) the survey alone. Enrolled Veterans will be candidates for either
endovascular or open repair, and be followed at VA hospitals by vascular surgery teams who regularly perform
both types of repair. In Aim 1, we will determine Veterans' preferences for endovascular or open repair and
identify domains associated with each repair type. In Aim 2, we will compare agreement between Veterans'
preferences and repair type between the decision aid+survey and survey-alone groups. We will identify factors
associated with agreement. Our findings will be reported to the National Surgery Office Vascular Surgery
Advisory Board to help ensure Veterans' preferences remain at the center of AAA treatment decisions. We
have recruited 20 VA Medical Centers and their vascular surgery teams who are anxious to participate in this
important trial to help Veterans make the best decisions.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Surveillance priorities and outcomes for Veterans treated with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
-
批准号:10673672
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2022
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Alignment of Treatment Preferences and Repair Type for Veterans with AAA
-
批准号:10186485
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2017
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Leveraging Health IT to Avoid Unnecessary Asymptomatic Carotid Revascularization
-
批准号:8733508
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$13.46万
-
财政年份:2013
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Leveraging Health IT to Avoid Unnecessary Asymptomatic Carotid Revascularization
-
批准号:8637508
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$16.11万
-
财政年份:2013
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PAD
-
批准号:8029431
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$13.99万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PAD
-
批准号:8695453
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$13.99万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PAD
-
批准号:8469896
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$13.99万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PAD
-
批准号:8144324
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$13.99万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
Understanding Variation in Treatment Intensity with Lower Extremity PAD
-
批准号:8267739
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$13.99万
-
财政年份:2010
-
负责人:Philip P Goodney
-
依托单位:
海外基金