课题基金 / 基金详情

Comparative effectiveness of social physical play and traditional exercise programming

Comparative effectiveness of social physical play and traditional exercise programming
社交体育游戏与传统锻炼计划的效果比较
批准号:
10002285
负责人:
CHRISTOPHER N. SCIAMANNA
金额:
$70.81万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2019
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2019-09-01 至 2022-08-31

项目摘要

项目成果

CHRISTOPHER N. SCIAMANNA的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Fewer than 1 in 10 middle-aged US adults get the recommended amount of aerobic physical activity (PA), greatly increasing their chances of heart disease and stroke. There are over 50 million adults with fitness center memberships, which are used only once per month and, after joining new programs, people quickly stop coming. While many barriers to PA have been cited (e.g., time, cost), we believe that a key, modifiable, and underappreciated barrier is that most adults simply do not enjoy physical activity enough to do it regularly. Studies consistently observe that people who enjoy physical activity more are more likely to be more active in the future. Despite this consistent observation, we are not aware of studies that ask “Would an adult PA program designed to maximize enjoyment increase PA adherence and fitness?”. In 2015, our team set out to design an exercise program for adults that maximized enjoyment. Taking inspiration from Pickleball, a popular game of modified tennis, our team created PlayFit. PlayFit is an exercise program in which adults come together three times each week to play a range of sports, all modified to 1) reduce effort (e.g., smaller playing area), 2) reduce injuries (e.g., lightweight low-pressure balls) and 3) reduce competitiveness (e.g., teams chosen randomly, minimize physical contact, no keeping score). Pilot work in the summer of 2016 with 22 adults identified five modified sports that all had MET levels between 5.5 and 6.5 and high satisfaction scores (average of 8.0 out of 10). More importantly, the comments suggest that we have created a social, enjoyable experience: “that was SO much fun”, “I’ve never had so much fun playing soccer”. People liked “the laughter during the games”, “no pressure, not competitive” and that “it’s not about ability, it’s just about having fun with people”. In this study, we propose testing whether PlayFit leads to greater fitness gains, compared to group fitness, to help providers understand in a way that helps providers and fitness center staff understand: “What exercise program should I recommend to promote long-term adherence and fitness?”. All subjects will be expected to exercise three-times weekly for 60 minutes for 12 months. We will randomly assign 280 adults to two conditions: 1) Group Fitness activities and 2) PlayFit. We hypothesize that both PlayFit and Group Fitness will increase V02max significantly at 6 months but, after 12 months, mediated by greater enjoyment and higher adherence, participants randomized to PlayFit will have greater fitness and activity gains at 12 months than Group Fitness. The results of this study have the potential to help patients, providers and fitness center directors by answering the question: “What exercise program should be recommended to sedentary adults in order to promote long-term adherence and fitness?"
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Impact of brief daily functional resistance training on lower extremity physical performance
Comparative effectiveness of social physical play and traditional exercise programming
Comparative effectiveness of social physical play and traditional exercise programming
I: Penn State Institutional Career Development Core
海外基金