Evaluation of Methods for Implementation of a Comfort Care Order Set

舒适护理指令集实施方法的评估

• 批准号: 10028216
• 负责人: KATHRYN Larsen BURGIO
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: BIRMINGHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2015
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2015-02-01 至 2021-01-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10028216
• 关键词: Attitude; Behavior; Caring; Cessation of life; Computerized Patient Records; Consult; Data; Distress; Do Not Resuscitate Order; Education; Educational Intervention; Educational Materials; Educational process of instructing; Educational workshop; Effectiveness; Emotional; Evaluation; Funding; Goals; Healthcare; Healthcare Systems; Home environment; Hospice Care; Hour; Iatrogenesis; Infrastructure; Inpatients; Intervention; Interview; Intravenous; Knowledge; Life; Location; Medical; Medical Records; Medical center; Methods; Opioid; Opioid Analgesics; Palliative Care; Pastoral Care; Patient Care; Patients; Perception; Persons; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physical Sufferings; Preparation; Process; Provider; Quality of Care; Questionnaires; Randomized; Research; Research Personnel; Self Efficacy; Site; Structure; Supportive care; System; Teleconferences; Telephone Interviews; Testing; Time; Trainers Training; Training; Tube; Veterans; base; clinical practice; compare effectiveness; design; end of life; end of life care; experience; hospice environment; implementation strategy; improved; intervention effect; member; preference; primary endpoint; programs; provider-level barriers; recruit; restraint; secondary endpoint; skills; social; treatment planning; trend

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Anticipated Impacts on Veterans' Healthcare: The overarching goal of this research program is to improve the quality of end-of-life care provided to veterans dying in VA Medical Centers, by transferring the best practices of home hospice and palliative care for the last days and hours of life into the inpatient setting. Project Background: Often, patients who are near the end of life are not recognized as actively dying. As a result, their suffering may not be appreciated or managed properly, and may even be exacerbated by usual medical care when aggressive, futile, or iatrogenically harmful treatments are continued. During this time, supportive and comfort care treatment plans can be implemented to reduce suffering and improve the quality of care provided to these patients. The investigative team has developed and evaluated an education-based intervention to teach providers how to identify patients who are actively dying and to implement care plans appropriate for the last days or hours of life. To facilitate use of these interventions, an electronic Comfort Care Order Set (CCOS) was designed and integrated into the Computerized Patient Record System (CPRS) to support and guide the selection of comfort care treatments. The effectiveness of the Comfort Care Education Intervention has been demonstrated in 7 VAMCs and it is ready for implementation on a broader scale. Project Objectives: The proposed trial will extend this line of research by examining two methods of delivering this Comfort Care Education Intervention utilizing the established infrastructure of Palliative Care Consult Teams (PCCT): a Basic Implementation Approach using a teleconference to review educational materials and activate PCCTs to educate other providers, and an Enhanced Implementation Approach utilizing in-person, train-the-"champion" workshops to prepare PCCT members to be leaders and trainers at their home sites. The aims of this study are 1) to compare the effectiveness of the two approaches for changing provider behavior, as reflected in documented processes of end-of-life care, 2) to formatively evaluate PCCT members' experiences with and perceptions of the two approaches, 3) to quantitatively evaluate PCCT members' perceptions of the training received and its impact on attitudes, skills, and perceived efficacy to care for patients and teach other providers, and 4) to assess the downstream effect of the intervention on providers at all sites who receive training from PCCT members, including their perceptions of the value of the education and its impact on knowledge, attitudes, skills, and practice. Project Methods: Forty-eight VA Medical Centers will be recruited to participate in the trial and randomized to receive the Comfort Care Education Intervention using the Basic or the Enhanced Implementation Approach. Data on processes of end-of-life care will be abstracted from the CPRS medical records of veterans who die before and after the interventions, including presence of an active opioid order at time of death (primary endpoint), other medication orders and administration, do-not-resuscitate orders, palliative care consult orders, location of death, presence of nasogastric tubes/intravenous lines, restraints, and pastoral care. Semi-structured telephone interviews will be conducted with all participating PCCT members to explore their perceptions of training, the process of teaching other providers at each site, barriers and facilitators they encountered, how prepared they felt to overcome these barriers, and specific needs and preferences regarding the implementation approach. PCCT members at all sites will complete a post-training questionnaire to evaluate the usefulness of the training and its impact in terms of changing their attitudes about end-of-life care; recognition of dying patients; self- efficacy in ordering appropriate care plans; and clinica practice, including likelihood of using CCOS. Findings will provide a robust evaluation of the implementation process, and will be used to refine the Comfort Care Education Intervention and implementation strategies in preparation for nationwide dissemination of best practices for end-of-life care within the VA Healthcare System.

描述（由申请人提供）：