Professional Development Core

项目摘要/摘要：专业发展核心 专业发展核心(PDC)将通过以下方式促进人工智能--CTRC的总体目标 以及扩大发展和维持土著健康研究中心所需的智力基础设施 在蒙大拿州和阿拉斯加。为实现这一目标，方案发改委将实现以下具体目标：具体目标1。 提高阿拉斯加和蒙大拿州研究人员在启动临床和 人工智能--健康领域的翻译研究。这将通过提供关于以下方面的需求的研讨会来实现 人工智能--健康领域的临床研究，资助机会，以及如何启动和维持此类研究 通过AI-AN CTRC机制。PDC还将制定一项教师研讨会交流计划，以资助 既有现有的和潜在的新的临床研究人员，前往阿拉斯加或蒙大拿州举办研讨会 ，并访问了两个州的表演场地机构和地方调查人员 从而促进对土著健康的兴趣和合作的发展。具体目标2.要发展， 通过指导，阿拉斯加和蒙大拿州的研究人员在临床上有效的能力 健康研究。这将通过以下方式实现：首先开发导师来源，然后将他们联系起来 有了新的AI-an CTRC临床调查人员。辅导将分4个级别进行。1)一对一辅导 被辅导者和主要的科学导师，2)被辅导者和指导委员会之间的指导，3) 受训者与社区参与和外联(CEOC)之间的指导以及4)之间的指导 学员和外部咨询委员会(选管会)。具体目标3.增强阿拉斯加人的能力 和蒙大拿州的研究人员开发和维持他们的临床和翻译研究计划。 PDC将为每个辅导者构建一个临床研究开发计划。该计划将包括 课程清单，涵盖临床和转化性研究的方方面面，根据 导师。这些课程将通过华盛顿大学(UW‘s CTSA)的在线课程提供。 和内华达大学的CTR-IN(联合国的IDEA CTR)。将通过以下方式鼓励项目的可持续性 PDC通过组织拨款申请粉笔讲座，与学员合作制定适当的建议 允许初级和成熟的临床研究人员在他们提出拨款建议之前提出他们的想法 在可能有缺陷的想法或目标上花大力气写一份提案。然后，PDC将与 指导对象完成建议书准备过程。然后，学员将接受管理方面的指导 计划和人员，以及赠款管理。具体目标4.与评价核心合作以 不断评估方案发改委在实现其目标方面的进展情况，并在需要时利用 为程序和/或组织变革提供信息的评价，以促进核心的实现； 因此，中锋的目标。评估对这一计划至关重要，因此，继续或更改 更好地实现其目标所需的核心程序性战略，将受到评价结果的推动。

Project Summary/Abstract: Professional Development Core The Professional Development Core (PDC) will contribute to the overall goal of AI-AN CTRC by developing and expanding the intellectual infrastructure needed to develop and sustain a center for Native health research in Montana and Alaska. To achieve this, the PDC will accomplish the following specific aims: Specific Aim 1. Increase interest and opportunities of Alaskan and Montanan researchers in initiating clinical and translational research in AI-AN health. This will be accomplished by offering workshops on the needs for clinical research in AI-AN health, opportunities for funding, and how to initiate and sustain such research through AI-AN CTRC mechanisms. The PDC will also develop a faculty seminar exchange program funding both established and potential new clinical investigators, to travel to either Alaska or Montana to give seminars of their research, and visit with local investigators at each of the two state’s performance site institutions and thus facilitate development of interest and collaborations in Native health. Specific Aim 2. To develop, through mentoring, the ability of Alaskan and Montanan researchers to be effective in clinical Native health research. This will be accomplished by firstly developing a source of mentors and then linking them with new AI-AN CTRC clinical investigators. Mentoring will occur at 4 levels. 1) One-on-one mentoring between the mentee and the primary, scientific mentor, 2) mentoring between the mentee and the Mentoring Board, 3) mentoring between the mentee and Community Engagement and Outreach (CEOC) and 4) mentoring between the mentee and the External Advisory Committee (EAC). Specific Aim 3. To enhance the ability of Alaskan and Montanan researchers to develop and sustain their clinical and translational research programs. The PDC will construct a clinical research development program for each mentee. This program will consist of a list of courses, covering all aspects of clinical and translational research, personalized to the needs of the mentee. These courses will be offered on line through the ITHS of the University of Washington (UW’s CTSA) and the CTR-IN of the University of Nevada (UN’s IDeA CTR). Sustainability of projects will be encouraged by the PDC by working with mentees to develop appropriate proposals by organizing grant application chalk talks to allow junior and established clinical investigators to present their ideas for a grant proposal before they invest significant effort writing a proposal on ideas or aims that might be flawed. The PDC will then work with the mentee through the proposal preparation process. Then, mentees will be mentored on management of program and personnel, as well as grant management. Specific Aim 4. To work with the Evaluation Core to constantly assess the progress of the PDC in achieving its goals and when needed, to utilize evaluation to inform procedural and/or organizational changes to facilitate achievement of the Core, and therefore the Center goals. Evaluation is crucial to this program, thus, continuation or changes in procedural strategies of the core needed to better achieve its aims, will be driven by results of evaluation.