An Integrated Data Approach to Exploring Racial Differences in Reading Intervention Effectiveness
探索阅读干预效果中种族差异的综合数据方法
基本信息
- 批准号:10567796
- 负责人:
- 金额:$ 67.5万
- 依托单位:
- 依托单位国家:美国
- 项目类别:
- 财政年份:2023
- 资助国家:美国
- 起止时间:2023-05-08 至 2028-04-30
- 项目状态:未结题
- 来源:
- 关键词:Academic achievementAccountingAchievementAddressAffectAfrican American studentAgeArchivesBlack raceCharacteristicsComplexCritical Race TheoryDataData AggregationData AnalysesData SetDevelopmentDisparityEducationEffectivenessEffectiveness of InterventionsGoalsGrowthHealthIndividualIndividual DifferencesInfrastructureInterventionIntervention StudiesInvestmentsLanguageMeasuresMethodologyModelingOralOutcomePersonal SatisfactionPositioning AttributePovertyRaceReadingReading DisabilitiesResearchResearch PersonnelResearch Project GrantsResourcesRiskRoleSamplingScientific InquirySocial EnvironmentSocioeconomic StatusSourceStatistical ModelsStudentsSystemSystems TheoryTestingTimeUnited States National Institutes of Healthacademic interventiondata integrationdata repositorydisabilityeducation researcheighth gradeevidence basefourth gradeintervention effectpeerpsychologicracial differencereading abilityresponseskillsstemstudent participationtherapy developmenttreatment effecttreatment response
项目摘要
PROJECT SUMMARY
Persistent, intractable challenges with reading acquisition present critical educational and health concerns as
reading is a known indicator of lifetime earnings, general health, and overall wellbeing (OECD, 2012). Decades
of educational research has contributed to the development and testing of supplemental reading interventions
that provide intensive, targeted support to promote achievement for students with or at-risk for reading
disability (RD). However, to date, there has been no comprehensive exploration of racial differences in reading
intervention effectiveness. National data indicate that only 18% of Black students read at or above proficient
levels in fourth grade, compared to 45% of their White peers (NAEP, 2019). This gap does not narrow with age
(15% and 42% at eighth grade), nor has it narrowed over time (NAEP, 2019). Furthering our understanding of
these disparities in reading achievement requires scientific inquiry that disentangles the role of race in
determining intervention effectiveness. The exploration of racial differences has been dissuaded in part by a
lack of representation of Black students in educational and psychological research (e.g., Graham, 1992;
Graves et al., 2021; Lindo, 2006), and a predominantly race neutral approach to intervention development and
testing. Thus, the overall goal of the proposed project is to aggregate data from rigorous studies of
supplemental reading interventions for students with or at-risk for RD to investigate the presence of differential
intervention effects between Black and White students. We use a cross-disciplinary framework that integrates
bioecological systems theory, which recognizes sources of individual difference that stem from dynamic
interactions within and between our social environments, with QuantCrit, a methodological subfield of critical
race theory. Taken together, this framework recognizes that our interventions are likely not race neutral and
complex systems may differentially affect the effectiveness of these interventions for certain groups of
students. The proposed integrated dataset, representing more than 39 million dollars in federal research
investment, will be archived and shared on the LDbase data repository. By leveraging the existing
infrastructure of LDbase and making use of previously committed NIH resources, we are uniquely situated to
address the overall goal of the research project through three specific aims (SA). First, we will assemble an
integrated dataset with data from rigorous reading intervention studies (SA1). Second, we use the integrated
data to determine whether there are differential intervention effects for Black students compared to their White
peers (SA2). And finally, we identify characteristics of students, interventions, and outcomes that explain
differential response to reading intervention for Black students as compared to their White peers (SA3).
项目总结
阅读习得带来的持续、棘手的挑战带来了关键的教育和健康问题,如
阅读是衡量终生收入、总体健康和整体福祉的已知指标(OECD,2012年)。几十年
教育研究为补充阅读干预措施的开发和测试做出了贡献
提供密集的、有针对性的支持,以促进有阅读障碍或有阅读风险的学生的成就
伤残(RD)。然而,到目前为止,还没有关于阅读中的种族差异的全面探索
干预效果。全国数据显示,只有18%的黑人学生的阅读水平达到或超过熟练程度
四年级的水平,而白人同龄人的这一比例为45%(NAEP,2019年)。这种差距不会随着年龄的增长而缩小。
(八年级时分别为15%和42%),随着时间的推移也没有缩小(NAEP,2019年)。加深对……的理解
阅读成绩的这些差异需要科学研究,以理清种族在阅读中的作用
确定干预效果。对种族差异的探索在一定程度上受到了一种
黑人学生在教育和心理学研究中缺乏代表性(例如,Graham,1992;
Graves等人,2021;Lindo,2006),以及以种族中立为主的方法来干预开发和
测试。因此,拟议项目的总体目标是从严格的研究中汇总数据
对有RD或RD高危学生的补充阅读干预,以调查差异的存在
黑人和白人学生之间的干预效果。我们使用一个跨学科的框架,将
生物生态系统理论,它认识到源于动态的个体差异的根源
在我们的社会环境内和社会环境之间的互动,以及QuantCrit,一个关键的方法论子领域
种族理论。总而言之,这一框架认识到,我们的干预可能不是种族中立的,
复杂的系统可能会不同地影响这些干预措施对某些群体的有效性
学生们。拟议的综合数据集,代表着超过3900万美元的联邦研究资金
投资,将在LDbase数据库数据库中存档和共享。通过利用现有的
LDbase的基础设施和利用之前承诺的NIH资源,我们处于独特的位置
通过三个具体目标(SA)阐述研究项目的总体目标。首先,我们将组装一个
整合了来自严格阅读干预研究的数据集(SA1)。第二,我们使用集成的
确定黑人学生和白人学生的干预效果是否存在差异的数据
同级(SA2)。最后,我们确定了学生的特征、干预措施和结果,以解释
黑人学生与白人学生对阅读干预的不同反应(SA3)。
项目成果
期刊论文数量(0)
专著数量(0)
科研奖励数量(0)
会议论文数量(0)
专利数量(0)
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ journalArticles.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ monograph.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ sciAawards.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ conferencePapers.updateTime }}
{{ item.title }}
- 作者:
{{ item.author }}
数据更新时间:{{ patent.updateTime }}
Jessica R. Toste其他文献
Understanding Unresponsiveness to Tier 2 Reading Intervention
了解对二级阅读干预的反应迟钝
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2014 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Jessica R. Toste;D. Compton;D. Fuchs;L. Fuchs;Jennifer K Gilbert;Eunsoo Cho;Laura A. Barquero;B. Bouton - 通讯作者:
B. Bouton
Does Knowing What a Word Means Influence How Easily Its Decoding is Learned?
了解单词的含义是否会影响其解码的容易程度?
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2017 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0
- 作者:
Mélissa Michaud;Éric Dion;Anne Barrette;V. Dupéré;Jessica R. Toste - 通讯作者:
Jessica R. Toste
Reading Big Words: Instructional Practices to Promote Multisyllabic Word Reading Fluency
阅读大单词:促进多音节单词阅读流畅性的教学实践
- DOI:
10.1177/1053451216676797 - 发表时间:
2017 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:0.8
- 作者:
Jessica R. Toste;K. Williams;Philip Capin - 通讯作者:
Philip Capin
Perceptions of Academic Performance
对学业表现的看法
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2013 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:3
- 作者:
N. Heath;Elizabeth Roberts;Jessica R. Toste - 通讯作者:
Jessica R. Toste
Self–Determination to Increase Oral Reading Fluency Performance: Pilot and Replication Single–Case Design Studies
提高口语阅读流畅性的自我决定:试点和复制单案例设计研究
- DOI:
- 发表时间:
2020 - 期刊:
- 影响因子:1.8
- 作者:
L. Didion;Jessica R. Toste;Sarah A. Benz - 通讯作者:
Sarah A. Benz
Jessica R. Toste的其他文献
{{
item.title }}
{{ item.translation_title }}
- DOI:
{{ item.doi }} - 发表时间:
{{ item.publish_year }} - 期刊:
- 影响因子:{{ item.factor }}
- 作者:
{{ item.authors }} - 通讯作者:
{{ item.author }}
相似海外基金
Unraveling the Dynamics of International Accounting: Exploring the Impact of IFRS Adoption on Firms' Financial Reporting and Business Strategies
揭示国际会计的动态:探索采用 IFRS 对公司财务报告和业务战略的影响
- 批准号:
24K16488 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists
Mighty Accounting - Accountancy Automation for 1-person limited companies.
Mighty Accounting - 1 人有限公司的会计自动化。
- 批准号:
10100360 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Collaborative R&D
Accounting for the Fall of Silver? Western exchange banking practice, 1870-1910
白银下跌的原因是什么?
- 批准号:
24K04974 - 财政年份:2024
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
CPS: Medium: Making Every Drop Count: Accounting for Spatiotemporal Variability of Water Needs for Proactive Scheduling of Variable Rate Irrigation Systems
CPS:中:让每一滴水都发挥作用:考虑用水需求的时空变化,主动调度可变速率灌溉系统
- 批准号:
2312319 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Standard Grant
A New Direction in Accounting Education for IT Human Resources
IT人力资源会计教育的新方向
- 批准号:
23K01686 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
An empirical and theoretical study of the double-accounting system in 19th-century American and British public utility companies
19世纪美国和英国公用事业公司双重会计制度的实证和理论研究
- 批准号:
23K01692 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
An Empirical Analysis of the Value Effect: An Accounting Viewpoint
价值效应的实证分析:会计观点
- 批准号:
23K01695 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Accounting model for improving performance on the health and productivity management
提高健康和生产力管理绩效的会计模型
- 批准号:
23K01713 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
New Role of Not-for-Profit Entities and Their Accounting Standards to Be Unified
非营利实体的新角色及其会计准则将统一
- 批准号:
23K01715 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别:
Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C)
Improving Age- and Cause-Specific Under-Five Mortality Rates (ACSU5MR) by Systematically Accounting Measurement Errors to Inform Child Survival Decision Making in Low Income Countries
通过系统地核算测量误差来改善特定年龄和特定原因的五岁以下死亡率 (ACSU5MR),为低收入国家的儿童生存决策提供信息
- 批准号:
10585388 - 财政年份:2023
- 资助金额:
$ 67.5万 - 项目类别: