Linking the Legacy Effect in Type 2 Diabetes to Clinical Decision Making

将 2 型糖尿病的遗留影响与临床决策联系起来

• 批准号: 8704929
• 负责人: Neda Laiteerapong
• 金额: $ 17.61万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2012
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2012-09-01 至 2017-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8704929
• 关键词: Address; Adherence; Adoption; Adult; Affect; Age; Behavior Therapy; Behavioral; Belief; Biometry; Blood Pressure; California; Caring; Characteristics; Chicago; Chronic Disease; Clinical; Clinical Investigator; Clinical Trials; Commit; Communication; Complex; Data; Data Analyses; Data Set; Decision Making; Diabetes Mellitus; Diagnosis; Disease; Disease Management; Elderly; Endocrinology; Epidemiologist; Epidemiology; Face; Future; General Practices; Goals; Health; Hemoglobin; Insulin; Internist; Intervention Trial; Interview; K-Series Research Career Programs; Knowledge; Lead; Link; Medical; Mentors; Mentorship; Metformin; Microvascular Dysfunction; Morphologic artifacts; Myocardial Infarction; Newly Diagnosed; Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus; Observational Study; Outcome; Patient Care; Patients; Pattern; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Psychology; Race; Randomized; Randomized Controlled Trials; Regimen; Research; Research Personnel; Risk; Risk Factors; Selection Criteria; Structure; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Theoretical model; Time; Training; Translating; Translational Research; Translations; Treatment Protocols; United Kingdom; Universities; Work; arm; blood pressure regulation; career development; clinical care; clinical decision-making; clinical practice; cohort; disorder risk; experience; follow-up; glycemic control; health economics; improved; modifiable risk; mortality; novel; programs; prospective; ranpirnase; treatment as usual

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Observational follow-up of the landmark United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study revealed that early tight glycemic control had persistent benefits among adults with newly diagnosed diabetes even a decade after the trial had ended. This phenomenon has been dubbed the "legacy effect" of glycemic control and has not been observed for blood pressure control. The existence of the legacy effect implies that the timing of glycemic control, for example, early vs. late in the disease course, may have clinical consequences. This raises new fundamental diabetes translational research questions. In clinical practice, how soon after diagnosis do patients achieve hemoglobin A1C (A1C) and blood pressure (BP) control and for how long? How do different long-term patterns of control affect future health outcomes? And what do patients believe regarding how and when the timing of therapies to achieve A1C and BP control affects their health outcomes? I am an internist who is committed to exploring whether the legacy effect exists in clinical practice and how to translate this novel observation from clinical trials into improved clinical care. Using a large, observationl cohort of adults from Kaiser Permanente Northern California with newly diagnosed diabetes (1995-2005), I will (Aim 1) characterize common patterns of a) A1C and b) BP control over e10 years of follow-up and (Aim 2) compare complications/mortality rates over e15 years of follow-up among patients with various 10-year patterns of a) A1C and b) BP control. Then in order to develop a theoretical model for how patients perceive the concept of time in their diabetes-related health decisions, I will conduct semi-structured interviews with patients with Type 2 diabetes to (Aim 3) explore their beliefs regarding the timing of A1C and BP control. The results of these studies will be used to inform a future R01 behavioral intervention focused on improving patient outcomes through effective risk communication and appropriately timed efforts to intensify A1C and BP control. During this career development award, I will work closely with my mentor, Dr. Elbert Huang, who is a nationally- recognized investigator in medical decision making for older adults with diabetes and Director of the Quantitative Analysis Core and Enrichment Programs of the Chicago Center for Diabetes Translation Research (P30) at the University of Chicago, and my co-mentor, Dr. Andrew Karter, an accomplished diabetes epidemiologist at Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, in addition to my advisory panel of leaders in longitudinal data analysis, endocrinology, health economics and behavioral psychology. This proposed research, along with additional training in advanced epidemiology, biostatistics and behavioral psychology, and the expertise of my mentorship team will help me achieve my long-term goal of becoming an independent clinical investigator with expertise in the optimal timing of Type 2 diabetes treatments and its risk communication.

描述（由申请人提供）：具有里程碑意义的英国前瞻性糖尿病研究的观察性随访显示，即使在试验结束十年后，早期严格控制血糖对新诊断的糖尿病成年人仍有持续的益处。这种现象被称为血糖控制的“遗留效应”，尚未在血压控制中观察到。遗留效应的存在意味着血糖控制的时机，例如，在病程的早期或晚期，可能有临床后果。这就提出了新的基本的糖尿病转化研究问题。在临床实践中，患者在诊断后多久能达到血红蛋白A1C （A1C）和血压（BP）的控制，控制多长时间？不同的长期控制模式如何影响未来的健康结果？患者认为控制糖化血红蛋白和血压的治疗时机如何以及何时影响他们的健康结果？我是一名内科医生，致力于探索遗留效应是否存在于临床实践中，以及如何将这种新的观察结果从临床试验转化为改进的临床护理。使用来自北加州Kaiser Permanente新诊断糖尿病的成人（1995-2005）的大型观察队列，我将（目的1）描述10年随访期间a) A1C和b)血压控制的常见模式，（目的2）比较10年不同类型a) A1C和b)血压控制的患者在15年随访期间的并发症/死亡率。然后，为了建立一个理论模型，了解患者在糖尿病相关健康决策中如何感知时间概念，我将对2型糖尿病患者进行半结构化访谈，以（目标3）探索他们对糖化血红蛋白和血压控制时间的看法。这些研究的结果将为未来的R01行为干预提供信息，重点是通过有效的风险沟通和适当的时间努力加强A1C和血压控制来改善患者的预后。在这个职业发展奖期间，我将与我的导师Elbert Huang博士和我的共同导师Andrew Karter博士密切合作。Elbert Huang博士是全国公认的老年糖尿病患者医疗决策研究者，也是芝加哥大学芝加哥糖尿病转化研究中心（P30）定量分析核心和浓缩项目的主任，Andrew Karter博士是Kaiser Permanente北加州研究部的一位成功的糖尿病流行病学家。除了我的纵向数据分析，内分泌学，健康经济学和行为心理学的顾问小组。这项拟议的研究，加上高级流行病学、生物统计学和行为心理学方面的额外培训，以及我的导师团队的专业知识，将帮助我实现我的长期目标，即成为一名独立的临床研究者，在2型糖尿病治疗的最佳时机和风险沟通方面具有专业知识。