The eyes as pointers to serial memory

记忆是人类认知的重要组成部分，目前的研究越来越认识到眼球运动在记忆过程中的重要作用。在不断变化的视觉环境中保留有关物体位置的信息是许多复杂的日常任务的基础。例如，在驾驶时，重要的是能够保留和检索有关外部和内部环境的相关特征的信息。这可能包括物体、建筑物和人的大致位置，交通的速度和位置，地点标志的信息，汽车内显示器的控制和信息。这个项目将解决以下问题：眼球运动的控制和分布是否反映了任务相关信息的视觉编码之外的心理过程（心灵-眼睛假说），以及即使在物品从视野中消失后，眼睛的配置是否可以用来预测物品出现的空间是被记住还是被遗忘。它将阐明关于视觉空间短期记忆（STM）能力限制的本质和遗忘的来源的长期和基本问题，无论是记忆的衰退还是后续事件的干扰。该项目将使用创新的眼球追踪技术，结合表现测量，将眼睛的运动映射到记忆的关键认知组成部分。研究结果将为关于STM的本质、局限性和视觉空间记忆遗忘的来源的辩论提供信息。它们将对产生正式的、计算的或数学的记忆模型的努力施加重要的限制。一个理论上的贡献将是确定记忆是否有固定的容量限制，或者在某种意义上是灵活的，即资源可以在需要记住的项目和任务之间有策略地分配。另一个重要贡献将是确定印痕（记忆痕迹）的衰减或后续活动的干扰是否是视觉空间记忆遗忘的最重要来源。然而，第三个理论贡献将是通过考虑记忆是否可以通过刺激的感知和（动眼）行动的计划来理解，来测试经典的模块化和基于对象的STM观点的替代方案。第四个结果将表明概念上类似的过程，如“手势”排练（在言语记忆中以发音排练的形式建立）的程度。在不同的感觉模式（如视觉）上并行操作。

Memory is a critical component of human cognition and current research is increasingly recognizing the vital role played by eye-movements in the memory process. Retaining information about where pertinent objects are in a changing visual environment underpins numerous complex everyday tasks. For example, while driving it is important to be able to retain and retrieve information about relevant features about the external and internal environment. This may include the general position of objects, buildings and people, the speed and position of traffic, information on place signs, the controls and information on displays within a car. This project will address the question of whether the control and distribution of eye movements reflects mental processes beyond the visual encoding of task-relevant information (the mind-eye hypothesis) and whether the disposition of the eyes, even after an item has disappeared from view, can be used to predict whether the space in which the item was present is remembered or forgotten. It will shed light on long-standing and fundamental questions about the nature of capacity-limits in visuo-spatial short-term memory (STM) and the sources of forgetting, whether by decay of the memory or interference from subsequent events. The project will use innovative eye-tracking techniques, combined with performance measures, to map the movement of the eyes to key cognitive components of memory. Results will inform the debate on the nature of STM, its limitations, and the sources of forgetting from visuo-spatial memory. They will impose important constraints on efforts to produce formal, computational or mathematical, models of memory. One theoretical contribution will be to establish whether memory has a fixed capacity limit or is flexible in the sense that resources can be allocated strategically across to-be-remembered items and tasks. Another major contribution will be to determine whether decay of the engram (memory trace) or interference from subsequent activity is the most important source of forgetting with visuo-spatial memory. Yet a third theoretical contribution will be to test an alternative to the classic modular and object-based views of STM by considering whether memory can, alternatively, be understood through the perception of stimuli and the planning of (oculomotor) actions and a fourth outcome will be an indication of the extent to which conceptually similar processes, such as "gestural" rehearsal (well-established within verbal memory, in the form of articulatory rehearsal), operate in parallel across different sensory modalities (e.g., vision).