【研究目的】探讨突发公共事件中局内外领导者和普通人的心理反应特点及逃生决策. 【研究问题】1.在突发公共事件中,何种信息线索更容易被采纳?局内外领导者和普通人在信息采纳方面是否存在差异？2.在突发公共事件中,不同的信息线索如何影响局内外人的逃生和管理决策?从众作为公共事件中最常见的一种信息线索是否更有利于逃生和疏散？3.在突发公共事件中,局内外领导者和普通人在直觉和分析决策方面是否存在差异?直觉和分析哪种策略更有利于做出正确决策？4.直觉和分析策略以及事件的紧急程度和局内外人的视野范围如何影响领导者和普通人对信息的采纳,进而如何影响逃生和疏散管理决策?【理论依据】Sweeny(2008)的危机决策三阶段理论模型以及Sayegh等(2004)的危机管理直觉决策模型.【主要方法】行为实验和仿真模拟技术.【预期结果】构建突发公共事件中局内外领导者和普通人的动态逃生决策模型.

【Purpose】to explore how people respond to the public emergency when they play different roles (leader versus mass; insider versus outsider), and accordingly how they make their escape decisions in such the emergency.【Research Question】1.In public emergency, what kind of information resource is more acceptable and whether there are differences in information adoption between insider versus outsider and leader versus mass. 2.How different information resources influence insiders and outsiders’ decisions in the whole process of escape and evacuation in public emergency, and whether herding, as the most common information resource, functions better than other information resource in escape and evacuation. 3.Whether leader versus mass and insider versus outsider choose differently in using intuitive or deliberative strategy in public emergency, and which strategy functions better in escape and evacuation. 4.How information adoption and further escape and evacuation decision of leader versus mass are influenced by intuitive-deliberative strategy, urgency degree and ken of insider and outsider.【Theoretical Background】Sweeny’s Crisis Decision Theory (2008, CDT), and Sayegh et al’s Managerial decision model under crisis in an intuitive decision process (2004).【Method】Lab study mainly using analogue simulation.【Expected Results】Constructing a dynamic decision model of leader versus mass and insider and outsider in public emergency, which would contribute to the literature of decision-making and also emergency management.