A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms.

A randomized controlled study of two educational interventions on adherence with oral contraceptives and condoms.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.007
复制
发表时间:
2012-12
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Rahman, Mahbubur
Rahman, Mahbubur
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Berenson, Abbey B.;Rahman, Mahbubur

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

该研究旨在检查两种不同干预措施对口服避孕药(OC)依从性和避孕套使用的有效性。共有1,155名16-24岁的女性要求OC随机接受面对面的行为咨询和教育在基线诊所访问(C组; n=383)或同样的干预,然后每月电话6个月(C+P组; n=384)或标准护理(S组; n=388)。首次访视后3个月、6个月和12个月的电话访谈以及病历审查评估了OC的持续性、安全套的使用以及其他几个次要和有临床意义的结局,如妊娠和性传播感染(STI)率以及正确使用避孕药。3个月(C+P:58%; C:50%; S:55%)、6个月(39%; 32%; 37%)或12个月(20%; 18%; 20%)后,干预对OC持续性无显著影响(p> 0.05)。不同干预方法的患者在最后一次性交时使用避孕套的情况没有差异(p> 0.05)。此外,未观察到对妊娠[S=48(12.4%),C=63(16.5%),C+P=52(13.5%); p=.22)和STI [S=18(4.6%),C=12(3.1%),C+P=13(3.4%); p=.50)率和正确使用药丸包的平均数量(p=.06)的影响。然而,那些随机分配到C+P组的患者比C和S组患者更有可能识别出一个提示,并报告说,根据3个月和6个月的随访信息,该提示起到了提醒他们按时服用OC的作用(所有关系的p<0.01)。本研究中的任何干预措施都没有改善年轻女性的OC依从性。ClinicalTrials.gov,www.ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT 00584038。
The study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of two different interventions on oral contraception (OC) adherence and condom use. A total of 1,155 women 16–24 years of age requesting OC were randomized to receive either face-to-face behavioral counseling and education at their baseline clinic visit (C group; n=383) or this same intervention followed by monthly phone calls for 6 months (C+P group; n=384) or standard care (S group; n=388). Phone interviews at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial visit as well as a medical record review assessed OC continuation, condom use, and several other secondary and clinically meaningful outcomes such as pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates, and correct use of pills. The interventions did not have a significant effect on OC continuation after 3 (C+P: 58%; C: 50%; S: 55%), 6 (39%; 32%; 37%) or 12 months (20%; 18%; 20%) (p>.05). Condom use at last sexual intercourse did not differ by intervention methods (p>.05). Moreover, no effect was observed on pregnancy [S=48 (12.4%), C=63 (16.5%), C+P=52 (13.5%); p=.22) and STI [S=18 (4.6%), C=12 (3.1%), C+P=13 (3.4%); p=.50) rates, and mean number of correctly used pill packs (p=.06). However, those randomized to C+P were more likely than C and S patients to identify a cue and report that the cue worked as a reminder to take their OC on time based on 3 and 6 months follow-up information (p<.01 for all relationships). Neither intervention in this study improved OC adherence among young women. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00584038.
DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00134-4
发表时间: 2003-08-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Jaccard, J;Dodge, T;Dittus, P
通讯作者: Dittus, P
DOI: 10.1177/003335491012500209
发表时间: 2010-03-01
影响因子: 3.3
作者:
Pazol, Karen;Kramer, Michael R.;Hogue, Carol J.
通讯作者: Hogue, Carol J.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1931-2393.2003.tb00110.x
发表时间: 2003-03-01
影响因子: 5.8
作者:
Kalmuss, D;Davidson, A;Cassell, C
通讯作者: Cassell, C
DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(96)00248-7
发表时间: 1996-09-01
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Cramer, JA
通讯作者: Cramer, JA
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170260021003
发表时间: 1996-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
Stanton, BF;Li, X;Kaljee, L
通讯作者: Kaljee, L