Suggestive Eyewitness Identification Procedures and the Supreme Court’s Reliability Test in Light of Eyewitness Science: 30 Years Later
Suggestive Eyewitness Identification Procedures and the Supreme Court’s Reliability Test in Light of Eyewitness Science: 30 Years Later
复制标题
暗示性目击者识别程序和最高法院根据目击者科学进行的可靠性测试：30 年后
DOI：
10.1007/s10979-008-9130-3
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Deah S. Quinlivan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Wells;Deah S. Quinlivan
美国最高法院关于暗示证人鉴定程序的裁决（Manson v. Braithwaite, 1977, 432 U.S. 98）在此后的30多年中没有被法院重审。与此同时，对目击证人的科学研究取得了进展，DNA证明无罪的证据表明，错误的指认是无辜被定罪的主要原因。我们从目击者科学的角度分析了曼森案的双重询问逻辑。讨论了几个问题。具有讽刺意味的是，我们注意到，暗示性识别程序（在第一次调查中确定）提高了目击者在五个标准（在第二次调查中使用）中的三个标准上的地位，这些标准用于确定暗示性程序是否存在问题。其净影响破坏了法院打算采取的保障措施，破坏了避免暗示性程序的动机。
The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling concerning suggestive eyewitness identification procedures (Manson v. Braithwaite, 1977, 432 U.S. 98) has not been revisited by the Court in the intervening 30+ years. Meanwhile, scientific studies of eyewitnesses have progressed and DNA exonerations show that mistaken identification is the primary cause of convictions of the innocent. We analyzed the two-inquiry logic in Manson in light of eyewitness science. Several problems are discussed. Ironically, we note that suggestive identification procedures (determined in the first inquiry) boost the eyewitnesses’ standing on three of the five criteria (used in the second inquiry) that are used to decide whether the suggestive procedures were a problem. The net effect undermines safeguards intended by the Court and destroys incentives to avoid suggestive procedures.
人类的学习和记忆。
影响因子：
24.8
作者：
Johnson,MK;Hasher,L
通讯作者：
Hasher,L