State-led commodification of rural China and the sustainable provision of public goods in question: A case study of Tangjiajia, Nanjing
State-led commodification of rural China and the sustainable provision of public goods in question: A case study of Tangjiajia, Nanjing
复制标题
国家主导的中国农村商品化和公共产品的可持续提供：以南京唐家家为例
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.004
复制
发表时间：
2019-03
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Jianfa Shen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mingrui Shen;Jianfa Shen
本文考察了一系列由国家主导的项目所引发的商品化过程，并对中国农村公共产品的可持续供给提出了质疑。我们质疑逐利群体对自发商品化的片面理解，并认为中国政府施加的影响不容忽视。研究发现，国家、私人投资者和村民之间形成了一种初步的伙伴关系，在南京郊区建立了一个名为汤家家的温泉村。重建是国家主导的建筑环境改造的结果，但它也催化了村民创业精神，促进了社区共识。在公共产品供给方面，村庄中的利益相关者现在免费享受政府提供的高质量设施和服务，但未能促进互惠合作，以补充农村公地的可减性。我们主张国家干预是暂时的，但不是万灵药。社区迫切需要一个可持续提供公共产品的定价机制。国家主导的商品化破坏了乡村治理原有的低水平均衡。从农村可持续发展的角度来看，只有农村社区的自组织才能解决这一困境。
This paper examines the commodification process initiated through a series of state-led programs and questions the sustainable public goods provision in rural China. We challenge the unilateral understanding of spontaneous commodification by the profit-seeking community, and argue that the influence exerted by the Chinese government cannot be ignored. It is found that a preliminary partnership among the state, private investors and villagers was formed to create a hot-spring village called Tangjiajia in suburban Nanjing. The reconstruction was the result of a state-led renovation of the built environment, but it also catalyzed villager entrepreneurship and boosted community consensus. Regarding the public goods provision, stakeholders in the village now enjoy high-quality facilities and services provided by the government for free but have failed to foster reciprocal cooperation to replenish the subtractability of the rural commons. We claim that state intervention is temporal but not a cure-all. A pricing mechanism for the sustainable delivery of public goods is urgently needed in the community. The state-led commodification has undermined the previous low-level equilibrium of rural governance. From the stance of rural sustainability, only self-organization of the rural community can solve the dilemma.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/02513625.2016.1195602
发表时间：
2016-04
期刊：
disP - The Planning Review
影响因子：
--
作者：
K. Kunzmann
通讯作者：
K. Kunzmann
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
G. Wilson
通讯作者：
G. Wilson
DOI：
10.1016/0743-0167(93)90026-g
发表时间：
1993-04
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Phillips
通讯作者：
M. Phillips
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
J. Newton;A. Franklin
通讯作者：
J. Newton;A. Franklin
影响因子：
--
作者：
T. Marsden;Li Yu;A. Flynn
通讯作者：
T. Marsden;Li Yu;A. Flynn