Complex planning landscapes: regimes, actors, instruments and discourses of contractual urban development

Complex planning landscapes: regimes, actors, instruments and discourses of contractual urban development
复制标题

复杂的规划景观:契约城市发展的制度、参与者、工具和话语

DOI:
10.1080/09654313.2019.1598018
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Tasan-Kok T
Tasan-Kok T
中科院分区:
经济学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tasan-Kok T

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

对金融市场、全球投资趋势和私营部门资金的日益依赖,使城市规划的监管格局发生了迅速和持续的变化。正如Raco等人所阐述的那样,私营部门参与的范围扩大,特别是随着房地产市场动态参与城市规划和治理,在这些复杂的规划格局中的决策过程、机制和工具方面产生了新形式的复杂性。在这一期中。在2008年全球金融危机之后,由于行为者、条例和规划机制的多样性迅速发生变化,有必要更好地了解在私营部门参与下管理和规划城市的复杂性,这成为城市规划文献中的必要内容。在这种背景下,规划学者已经开始呼吁对房地产行业的压力和优先事项有更复杂和更有建设性的理解,以超越一维的批判性分析(Campbell,Tait,&Watkins,2013)。本期特刊提供了一系列文章,有助于更好地了解房地产规划和城市治理的复杂动态,不仅提供了经验证据,说明其中涉及的复杂制度、行为者、工具和论述,而且还提供了新的方法,以了解私营部门参与公共规划的情况。通过使用一系列监管工具,公共部门试图建立不同的“保障机制”,以降低风险并确保公共服务不会因为私营部门的利润而受到损害(Forrer,Kee,Newcomer,&Boyer,2010)。规划在房地产主导的城市发展中发挥着至关重要的作用,因为它在借助合同等监管工具促进对建筑环境的投资方面发挥了重要作用。然而,正如我们在这本文集中所说的那样,私营部门,尤其是房地产行业的多样性,创造了一个复杂的监管格局,它通过各种工具在脱节的“微观监管口袋”中发挥作用,创造了Tasan-Kok等人所说的“临时创业型城市制度”。和Atkinson等人。在这本集合中详细阐述了。下表(2019)作者(S)。由Informa UK Limited出版,业务名称为Taylor&Francis Group
Increasing dependence on financial markets, global investment trends and private sector funding has brought about rapid and ongoing changes in the regulatory landscape of urban planning. The expansion of private sector involvement, especially with the involvement of property market dynamics in the planning and governance of cities, creates new forms of complexity in decision-making processes, mechanisms and tools in these complex planning landscapes, as elaborated by Raco et al. in this issue. In the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008, the need to develop a better understanding of the complexity of governing and planning cities with the involvement of the private sector became a necessity in urban planning literature as the diversity of actors, regulations and mechanisms of planning changed rapidly. Against this backdrop, planning scholars have already begun to call for a more sophisticated and constructive understanding of the pressures and priorities of the property industry to move beyond a one-dimensional critical analysis (Campbell, Tait, & Watkins, 2013). This special issue provides a collection of articles that contribute to a better understanding of the complex dynamics of propertyled planning and urban governance, not only by providing empirical evidence to illustrate the sophisticated regimes, actors, instruments and discourses involved in it, but also by offering new ways to understand private sector involvement in public planning. By using a range of regulatory instruments, the public sector has sought to create diverse ‘safeguarding mechanisms’ to reduce risk and ensure that public services are not compromised for the sake of private sector profits (Forrer, Kee, Newcomer, & Boyer, 2010). Planning has a crucial role to play in property-led urban development due to its part in facilitating investments in the built environment with the help of regulatory instruments, such as contracts. However, as we argue in this collection, the diversity within the private sector, and in particular within the property industry, creates a complex regulatory landscape which functions through diverse instruments in disjointed ‘pockets of micro-regulation’, creating ‘temporary entrepreneurial urban regimes’ as Tasan-Kok et al. and Atkinson et al. elaborates on in this collection. The ensuing© 2019 The Author (s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
通过社区参与城市复兴解决城市社会排斥问题
DOI: --
发表时间: 2003
期刊: Urban Renaissance?
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Atkinson
通讯作者: R. Atkinson
(用)新自由主义解释
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
J. Peck
通讯作者: J. Peck
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
M. Raco
通讯作者: M. Raco
不可治理性:烟雾背后是否有火?
DOI: --
发表时间: 1979
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Rose
通讯作者: R. Rose
战略规划作为变革实践的催化剂
DOI: --
发表时间: 2017
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
L. Albrechts
通讯作者: L. Albrechts