Complex planning landscapes: regimes, actors, instruments and discourses of contractual urban development
Complex planning landscapes: regimes, actors, instruments and discourses of contractual urban development
复制标题
复杂的规划景观:契约城市发展的制度、参与者、工具和话语
DOI:
10.1080/09654313.2019.1598018
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
2.8
通讯作者:
Tasan-Kok T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tasan-Kok T
Increasing dependence on financial markets, global investment trends and private sector funding has brought about rapid and ongoing changes in the regulatory landscape of urban planning. The expansion of private sector involvement, especially with the involvement of property market dynamics in the planning and governance of cities, creates new forms of complexity in decision-making processes, mechanisms and tools in these complex planning landscapes, as elaborated by Raco et al. in this issue. In the wake of the global financial crisis of 2008, the need to develop a better understanding of the complexity of governing and planning cities with the involvement of the private sector became a necessity in urban planning literature as the diversity of actors, regulations and mechanisms of planning changed rapidly. Against this backdrop, planning scholars have already begun to call for a more sophisticated and constructive understanding of the pressures and priorities of the property industry to move beyond a one-dimensional critical analysis (Campbell, Tait, & Watkins, 2013). This special issue provides a collection of articles that contribute to a better understanding of the complex dynamics of propertyled planning and urban governance, not only by providing empirical evidence to illustrate the sophisticated regimes, actors, instruments and discourses involved in it, but also by offering new ways to understand private sector involvement in public planning. By using a range of regulatory instruments, the public sector has sought to create diverse ‘safeguarding mechanisms’ to reduce risk and ensure that public services are not compromised for the sake of private sector profits (Forrer, Kee, Newcomer, & Boyer, 2010). Planning has a crucial role to play in property-led urban development due to its part in facilitating investments in the built environment with the help of regulatory instruments, such as contracts. However, as we argue in this collection, the diversity within the private sector, and in particular within the property industry, creates a complex regulatory landscape which functions through diverse instruments in disjointed ‘pockets of micro-regulation’, creating ‘temporary entrepreneurial urban regimes’ as Tasan-Kok et al. and Atkinson et al. elaborates on in this collection. The ensuing© 2019 The Author (s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
Urban Renaissance?
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Atkinson
通讯作者:
R. Atkinson
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Peck
通讯作者:
J. Peck
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. Raco
通讯作者:
M. Raco
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1979
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Rose
通讯作者:
R. Rose
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
L. Albrechts
通讯作者:
L. Albrechts