Replication in computing education research: researcher attitudes and experiences
Replication in computing education research: researcher attitudes and experiences
复制标题
计算机教育研究的复制：研究者的态度和经验
DOI：
10.1145/2999541.2999554
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Andrew Petersen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Ahadi;Arto Hellas;Petri Ihantola;A. Korhonen;Andrew Petersen
可复制性是科学方法的核心原则。然而，一些科学学科已经遭受了信心危机，这在很大程度上是由于对复制的态度。这项工作报告的价值计算教育研究社区与研究，旨在复制，再现或重复早期的研究。结果是从73个计算教育研究人员的调查。对这些回答的分析证实，我们这个领域的研究人员与其他经历复制危机的领域的研究人员持有许多相同的偏见。特别是，研究人员一致认为，原创作品-报告新现象的小说作品-具有更大的影响力，更有声望。他们还同意原创性是接受论文的重要标准，使这样的工作更有可能被发表。此外，虽然受访者同意发表的作品应该是可验证的，但他们怀疑这一标准在计算机教育领域是否得到广泛满足，并且不急于自己执行验证他人作品的工作。
Replicability is a core principle of the scientific method. However, several scientific disciplines have suffered crises in confidence caused, in large part, by attitudes toward replication. This work reports on the value the computing education research community associates with studies that aim to replicate, reproduce or repeat earlier research. The results were obtained from a survey of 73 computing education researchers. An analysis of the responses confirms that researchers in our field hold many of the same biases as those in other fields experiencing a crisis in replication. In particular, researchers agree that original works - novel works that report new phenomena - have more impact and are more prestigious. They also agree that originality is an important criteria for accepting a paper, making such work more likely to be published. Furthermore, while the respondents agree that published work should be verifiable, they doubt this standard is widely met in the computing education field and are not eager to perform the work of verifying others' work themselves.
影响因子：
5.9
作者：
Asendorpf, Jens B.;Conner, Mark;Wicherts, Jelte M.
通讯作者：
Wicherts, Jelte M.