Preemption contested: Suspect spaces and preventability in the July 7 inquest

Preemption contested: Suspect spaces and preventability in the July 7 inquest
复制标题

先发制人的争议:7 月 7 日审讯中的可疑空间和可预防性

DOI:
10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.08.001
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
M. Goede
M. Goede
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Goede

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

伦敦验尸官对2005年7月7日死亡事件的调查明确拒绝了安全部门能够而且应该能够在2005年7月之前将7/7肇事者确定为潜在的未来恐怖分子的说法。这些发现质疑了强大的后9/11安全逻辑的抢占和预期,认为安全干预是合乎逻辑的,在面对未知和未指明的威胁。本文分析了在验尸官的调查中进行的时空工作,特别关注其可预防性证据。调查提供了一个丰富的档案,其中干预和先发制人的潜力,以及随之而来的可疑空间的问题,参与,辩论,接受和拒绝。本文认为,调查使“7/7”从一个快速熟悉的框架作为预期的灾难,成为一个“关注的问题”的意义上讨论布鲁诺拉图尔。本文认为调查的模糊性,以及它为公众辩论和未来的替代概念开辟空间的方式;并通过接受和规范网络威胁的概念来关闭这种空间。
The London Coroner's Inquest into the deaths of July 7 2005 unequivocally rejected the notion that the security services could and should have been able to identify the 7/7 perpetrators as potential future terrorists before July 2005. These findings contest powerful post-9/11 security logics of preemption and anticipation that hold that security intervention is logical and desirable in the face of unknown and unspecified threats. This paper analyses the spatio-temporal work conducted in and through the Coroner's Inquest, with a specific focus on its preventability evidence. The Inquest provides a rich archive in which the potentialities for intervention and preemption, and concomitant questions of suspect spaces, are engaged, debated, accepted and rejected. This paper argues that the Inquest rendered ‘7/7’ from a fast a familiar framing as anticipated catastrophe, into a ‘matter of concern’ in the sense discussed by Bruno Latour. The paper considers the ambiguous nature of the Inquest, and the way in which it both opened space for public debate and alternative conceptions of futurity; and closed down such space by accepting and normalising notions of networked threat.
危险地区:巴基斯坦的援助与敌意
DOI: 10.1068/d2902ed2
发表时间: 2011
期刊: Society and Space
影响因子: --
作者:
Amoore L
通讯作者: Amoore L
可能性的政治:超越可能性的风险和安全
DOI: --
发表时间: 2013
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Amoore, Louise
通讯作者: Amoore, Louise
DOI: 10.1177/1750698011402570
发表时间: 2011
期刊: Memory Studies
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
Hoskins A
通讯作者: Hoskins A