Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV in serum from SARS-infected donors with ELISA and Western blot.

Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV in serum from SARS-infected donors with ELISA and Western blot.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.clim.2004.07.003
复制
发表时间:
2004-11
期刊:
Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Chen WF
Chen WF
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang YD;Li Y;Xu GB;Dong XY;Yang XA;Feng ZR;Tian C;Chen WF

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

产生来自严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)冠状病毒(SARA-CoV)的S蛋白的重组片段,并将其用于与商业SARS ELISA方法进行比较的蛋白质印迹(WB)测定。在85%的确诊SARS病例(n = 20)中,基于S2重组片段的WB呈阳性,这与使用热灭活SARS-CoV的商业ELISA相当。用其他4个重组片段在SARS确诊病例中的WB检出率较低(S1- 75%,S1-N-25%,S1-C-55%)。健康对照组(n = 60)血清的ELISA检测结果为2例弱阳性,其余均为阴性,而S2蛋白WB检测结果显示20例有SARS接触史的对照组中有3例阳性,40例无SARS接触史的对照组中无阳性。当评价来自具有SARS样症状的个体(n = 10)的per-2003血清时,ELISA和S2 WB之间出现差异(ELISA-100%阳性,S2 WB-30%阳性)。这些数据表明,S2 WB检测可能是特别有用的ELISA阴性SARS病例和一些ELISA阳性非SARS病例。
Recombinant fragments of S proteins from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARA-CoV) were generated and used in a Western blot (WB) assay that was compared to a commercial SARS ELISA method. In 85% of confirmed SARS cases (n = 20), the S2 recombinant fragment based WB was positive and this was comparable to the commercial ELISA using heat killed SARS-CoV. WB using the other four recombinant fragments in confirmed SARS cases generated lower rates of detection (S1—75%, S1-N—25%, S1-C—55%). Evaluation of sera from healthy controls (n = 60) resulted in two weakly positive ELISA results with the remainder being negative while the S2 protein WB demonstrated three positive results from the 20 controls with a history of SARS contact and no positive results in 40 noncontact controls. A discrepancy between the ELISA and S2 WB arose when evaluating per-2003 sera from individuals (n = 10) with SARS-like symptoms (ELISA—100% positive, S2 WB—30% positive). These data suggest that the S2 WB assay may be particularly useful in ELISA-negative SARS cases and in some ELISA-positive non-SARS cases.
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90220-j
发表时间: 1992-11
期刊: Virology
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Stewart JN;Mounir S;Talbot PJ
通讯作者: Talbot PJ
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.11.180
发表时间: 2004-01-23
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Ho TY;Wu SL;Cheng SE;Wei YC;Huang SP;Hsiang CY
通讯作者: Hsiang CY
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90095-2
发表时间: 1982-01-01
期刊: VIROLOGY
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
COLLINS, AR;KNOBLER, RL;BUCHMEIER, MJ
通讯作者: BUCHMEIER, MJ
DOI: 10.1086/374222
发表时间: 2003-04-15
影响因子: 11.8
作者:
Vabret, A;Mourez, T;Freymuth, F
通讯作者: Freymuth, F
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.78.9.4552-4560.2004
发表时间: 2004-05-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Babcock, GJ;Esshaki, DJ;Ambrosino, DM
通讯作者: Ambrosino, DM