Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption.
Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12874-022-01592-y
复制
发表时间：
2022-04-10
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Puljak L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bojcic R;Todoric M;Puljak L
2007年，AMSTAR（A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews，评估系统性综述的测量工具），一个系统性综述（SR）的关键评价工具，出版了，它已经成为SR评价中最广泛使用的工具之一。2017年9月，AMSTAR 2作为该工具的更新版本发布。这项混合方法研究旨在分析AMSTAR 2吸收的程度，并探索其吸收的潜在障碍。我们分析了2018年、2019年和2020年发表的文章中AMSTAR或AMSTAR 2的使用频率。我们调查了在分析的时间范围内使用AMSTAR而不是AMSTAR 2的作者，以确定他们的原因和障碍。这些作者的入选标准是投稿月份在2017年9月之后，即AMSTAR 2发表之后。共纳入871项研究。大多数（N = 451; 52%）使用AMSTAR 2，而44%（N = 382）使用AMSTAR，4%（N = 31）使用R-AMSTAR，其他使用工具组合。2018年，81%的分析研究使用AMSTAR，16%使用AMSTAR 2。2019年，52%的人使用AMSTAR，44%的人使用AMSTAR 2。在2020年发表的文章中，28%使用AMSTAR，而69%使用AMSTAR 2。作者调查表明，作者没有使用AMSTAR 2主要是因为他们不知道它，他们的协议已经建立，或在新工具发布时完成数据收集。使用AMSTAR 2的障碍是缺乏定量评估、认识不足、长度、特定项目的困难。在2018-2020年发表的文章中，在AMSTAR 2工具发表后提交给期刊的文章中，几乎一半的作者（44%）仍然使用该工具的旧版本AMSTAR。然而，AMSTAR的使用在随后的每一年都在下降。我们的调查表明，编辑和同行评审员没有要求作者使用新版本的工具。几乎没有发现使用AMSTAR 2的障碍，因此预计旧版本AMSTAR的使用将继续下降。在线版本包含补充材料，可通过10.1186/s12874-022-01592-y获得。
In 2007, AMSTAR (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews), a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews (SRs), was published, and it has since become one of the most widely used instruments for SR appraisal. In September 2017, AMSTAR 2 was published as an updated version of the tool. This mixed-methods study aimed to analyze the extent of the AMSTAR 2 uptake and explore potential barriers to its uptake. We analyzed the frequency of AMSTAR or AMSTAR 2 use in articles published in 2018, 2019 and 2020. We surveyed authors who have used AMSTAR but not AMSTAR 2 in the analyzed time frame to identify their reasons and barriers. The inclusion criterion for those authors was that the month of manuscript submission was after September 2017, i.e. after AMSTAR 2 was published. We included 871 studies. The majority (N = 451; 52%) used AMSTAR 2, while 44% (N = 382) used AMSTAR, 4% (N = 31) used R-AMSTAR and others used a combination of tools. In 2018, 81% of the analyzed studies used AMSTAR, while 16% used AMSTAR 2. In 2019, 52% used AMSTAR, while 44% used AMSTAR 2. Among articles published in 2020, 28% used AMSTAR, while AMSTAR 2 was used by 69%. An author survey indicated that the authors did not use AMSTAR 2 mostly because they were not aware of it, their protocol was already established, or data collection completed at the time when the new tool was published. Barriers towards AMSTAR 2 use were lack of quantitative assessment, insufficient awareness, length, difficulties with a specific item. In articles published in 2018-2020, that were submitted to a journal after AMSTAR 2 tool was published, almost half of the authors (44%) still used AMSTAR, the old version of the tool. However, the use of AMSTAR has been declining in each subsequent year. Our survey indicated that editors and peer-reviewers did not ask the authors to use the new version of the tool. Few barriers towards using AMSTAR 2 were identified, and thus it is anticipated that the use of the old version of AMSTAR will continue to decline. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01592-y.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Thomson K;Hillier-Brown F;Todd A;McNamara C;Huijts T;Bambra C
通讯作者：
Bambra C
DOI：
10.2174/1874210601004020084
发表时间：
2010-07-16
期刊：
The open dentistry journal
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kung J;Chiappelli F;Cajulis OO;Avezova R;Kossan G;Chew L;Maida CA
通讯作者：
Maida CA
影响因子：
4
作者：
Dosenovic S;Jelicic Kadic A;Vucic K;Markovina N;Pieper D;Puljak L
通讯作者：
Puljak L
AMSTAR的开发：评估系统评价方法学质量的测量工具。
影响因子：
4
作者：
Shea, Beverley J.;Grimshaw, Jeremy M.;Wells, George A.;Boers, Maarten;Andersson, Neil;Hamel, Candyce;Porter, Ashley C.;Tugwell, Peter;Moher, David;Bouter, Lex M.
通讯作者：
Bouter, Lex M.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Pollock M;Fernandes RM;Hartling L
通讯作者：
Hartling L