Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial.

Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3390/ijerph110706653
复制
发表时间:
2014-06-25
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Pereira MA
Pereira MA
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dutta N;Koepp GA;Stovitz SD;Levine JA;Pereira MA

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目的:这项研究的目的是确定在久坐的办公室工作人员中,安装坐立两用办公桌(SSD)是否会导致工作时间减少。方法:2012年1月至4月在明尼阿波利斯的一家企业进行了一项随机交叉试验。28名(9名男性,26名全职)久坐的办公室工作人员参加了为期4周的干预期,其中包括使用SSD在工作日逐渐取代50%的坐姿时间。体力活动是主要结局。情绪,能量水平,疲劳,食欲,饮食摄入量和生产力作为次要结果进行了探讨。结果:干预减少了21%(95%CI 18%-25%)的工作坐着的时间和4.8分钟/工作小时(95%CI 4.1-5.4分钟/工作小时)的久坐时间。对于40小时的工作周,这意味着用站立和久坐时间减少3.2小时来取代8小时的坐姿时间。非工作时间的活动水平没有变化。干预还增加了整体的幸福感,能量,减少疲劳,对生产力没有影响,并减少食欲和饮食摄入。工作站受到与会者的欢迎。结论:SSD干预成功地提高了工作时间的活动水平,而不改变非工作时间的活动水平。
Objective: This study was conducted to determine whether installation of sit-stand desks (SSDs) could lead to decreased sitting time during the workday among sedentary office workers. Methods: A randomized cross-over trial was conducted from January to April, 2012 at a business in Minneapolis. 28 (nine men, 26 full-time) sedentary office workers took part in a 4 week intervention period which included the use of SSDs to gradually replace 50% of sitting time with standing during the workday. Physical activity was the primary outcome. Mood, energy level, fatigue, appetite, dietary intake, and productivity were explored as secondary outcomes. Results: The intervention reduced sitting time at work by 21% (95% CI 18%–25%) and sedentary time by 4.8 min/work-hr (95% CI 4.1–5.4 min/work-hr). For a 40 h work-week, this translates into replacement of 8 h of sitting time with standing and sedentary time being reduced by 3.2 h. Activity level during non-work hours did not change. The intervention also increased overall sense of well-being, energy, decreased fatigue, had no impact on productivity, and reduced appetite and dietary intake. The workstations were popular with the participants. Conclusion: The SSD intervention was successful in increasing work-time activity level, without changing activity level during non-work hours.
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1931
发表时间: 2012-05
期刊: Diabetes care
影响因子: 16.2
作者:
Dunstan DW;Kingwell BA;Larsen R;Healy GN;Cerin E;Hamilton MT;Shaw JE;Bertovic DA;Zimmet PZ;Salmon J;Owen N
通讯作者: Owen N
DOI: 10.2337/db07-0882
发表时间: 2007-11-01
期刊: DIABETES
影响因子: 7.7
作者:
Hamilton, Marc T.;Hamilton, Deborah G.;Zderic, Theodore W.
通讯作者: Zderic, Theodore W.
DOI: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1104_5
发表时间: 2004-01-01
影响因子: 2.7
作者:
Miller, R;Brown, W
通讯作者: Brown, W
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006
发表时间: 1993-11-01
期刊: PHARMACOECONOMICS
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
REILLY, MC;ZBROZEK, AS;DUKES, EM
通讯作者: DUKES, EM
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0987
发表时间: 2011-02
期刊: Diabetes care
影响因子: 16.2
作者:
Bankoski A;Harris TB;McClain JJ;Brychta RJ;Caserotti P;Chen KY;Berrigan D;Troiano RP;Koster A
通讯作者: Koster A