The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization.

The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization.
复制标题

白人标准:领导者分类中的种族偏见。

DOI:
10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.758
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
The Journal of applied psychology
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
K. Phillips
K. Phillips
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. S. Rosette;Geoffrey J Leonardelli;K. Phillips

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在4个实验中,作者调查了种族是否被认为是商业领导者原型的一部分,如果是这样,它是否可以解释白色和非白色领导者的评价差异。前两项研究表明,“是白色”被认为是商业领袖原型的一个属性,参与者认为商业领袖比非领导者更多是白色,并且这种推断发生在不考虑组织种族组成(研究1),组织角色的种族组成,商业行业,以及组织中少数民族群体的类型(研究2)。最后2项研究显示,领导者分类解释可以最好地解释白色和非白色领导者评估的差异,其中白色目标被评估为更有效的领导者(研究3)和更有领导潜力(研究4),但只有当领导者最近被授予组织成功的荣誉时,这与领导者原型在确认和强化有关领导者绩效的个性化信息时更有可能被使用的预测相一致。研究结果表明,领导者种族和领导分类之间的联系。
In 4 experiments, the authors investigated whether race is perceived to be part of the business leader prototype and, if so, whether it could explain differences in evaluations of White and non-White leaders. The first 2 studies revealed that "being White" is perceived to be an attribute of the business leader prototype, where participants assumed that business leaders more than nonleaders were White, and this inference occurred regardless of base rates about the organization's racial composition (Study 1), the racial composition of organizational roles, the business industry, and the types of racial minority groups in the organization (Study 2). The final 2 studies revealed that a leader categorization explanation could best account for differences in White and non-White leader evaluations, where White targets were evaluated as more effective leaders (Study 3) and as having more leadership potential (Study 4), but only when the leader had recently been given credit for organizational success, consistent with the prediction that leader prototypes are more likely to be used when they confirm and reinforce individualized information about a leader's performance. The results demonstrate a connection between leader race and leadership categorization.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
L. Bruno
通讯作者: L. Bruno
DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.5.1083
发表时间: 1999
期刊: Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子: --
作者:
Kruschke,JK;Johansen,MK
通讯作者: Johansen,MK