The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180
复制
发表时间：
2011-12
影响因子：
17.3
通讯作者：
Grant J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Morris ZS;Wooding S;Grant J
本研究旨在回顾文献描述和量化的时间滞后在健康研究翻译过程中。如果论文量化了卫生干预措施制定过程中的时间滞后，则将其纳入审查。该研究确定了23篇论文。很少有可比性，因为不同的研究在不同的时间点使用不同的测量方法，不同的事情。我们的结论是，目前的知识状态的时间滞后是有限的使用那些负责研发和知识转移谁面临困难，知道他们应该或可以做什么，以减少时间滞后。这实际上“蒙蔽”了投资决策，并有浪费精力的风险。研究得出的结论是，理解滞后首先需要达成一致的模型、定义和衡量标准，这些模型、定义和衡量标准可以应用于实践。第二项任务是制定收集这些数据的程序。
This study aimed to review the literature describing and quantifying time lags in the health research translation process. Papers were included in the review if they quantified time lags in the development of health interventions. The study identified 23 papers. Few were comparable as different studies use different measures, of different things, at different time points. We concluded that the current state of knowledge of time lags is of limited use to those responsible for R&D and knowledge transfer who face difficulties in knowing what they should or can do to reduce time lags. This effectively ‘blindfolds’ investment decisions and risks wasting effort. The study concludes that understanding lags first requires agreeing models, definitions and measures, which can be applied in practice. A second task would be to develop a process by which to gather these data.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Balconi, Margherita;Brusoni, Stefano;Orsenigo, Luigi
通讯作者：
Orsenigo, Luigi
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
DIMASI, JA;HANSEN, RW;LASAGNA, L
通讯作者：
LASAGNA, L
影响因子：
2
作者：
Baumbusch, Jennifer L.;Kirkham, Sheryl Reimer;Anderson, Joan M.
通讯作者：
Anderson, Joan M.
影响因子：
120.7
作者：
DICKERSIN, K
通讯作者：
DICKERSIN, K
影响因子：
120.7
作者：
ANTMAN, EM;LAU, J;CHALMERS, TC
通讯作者：
CHALMERS, TC