Second solid cancers after radiation therapy: a systematic review of the epidemiologic studies of the radiation dose-response relationship.
Second solid cancers after radiation therapy: a systematic review of the epidemiologic studies of the radiation dose-response relationship.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.001
复制
发表时间:
2013-06-01
影响因子:
7
通讯作者:
Little, Mark P.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington;Gilbert, Ethel;Curtis, Rochelle;Inskip, Peter;Kleinerman, Ruth;Morton, Lindsay;Rajaraman, Preetha;Little, Mark P.
Rapid innovation in radiotherapy techniques has resulted in an urgent need for risk projection models for second cancer risks from high-dose radiation exposure, since direct observation of the late-effects of newer treatments will require patient follow-up for a decade or more. However, the patterns of cancer risk after fractionated high-dose radiation are much less well understood than those after lower-dose exposures (0.1–5 gray (Gy)). In particular, there is uncertainty about the shape of the dose-response curve at high doses, and the magnitude of the second cancer risk per unit dose. We reviewed the available evidence from epidemiologic studies of second solid cancers in organs that received high-dose exposure (>5Gy) from radiotherapy where dose-response curves were estimated from individual organ-specific doses. We included 28 eligible studies with 3,434 second cancer patients across 11 second solid cancers. Overall, there was little evidence that the dose-response curve was non-linear in the direction of a down-turn in risk, even at organ doses of ≥60Gy. Thyroid cancer was the only exception with evidence of a downturn after 20Gy. Generally the excess relative risk per Gy, taking account of age and sex, was 5–10 times lower than the risk from acute exposures of <2Gy among the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. However, the magnitude of the reduction in risk varied according to second cancer. The results from our review provide insights into radiation carcinogenesis from fractionated high-dose exposures, and are generally consistent with current theoretical models. The results can be used to refine the development of second solid cancer risk projection models for novel radiotherapy techniques.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Little, MP;Weiss, HA;Muirhead, CR
通讯作者:
Muirhead, CR
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Bhatti P;Veiga LH;Ronckers CM;Sigurdson AJ;Stovall M;Smith SA;Weathers R;Leisenring W;Mertens AC;Hammond S;Friedman DL;Neglia JP;Meadows AT;Donaldson SS;Sklar CA;Robison LL;Inskip PD
通讯作者:
Inskip PD
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Little, MP;Muirhead, CR
通讯作者:
Muirhead, CR
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Kry, Stephen F.;Salehpour, Mohammad;Followill, David
通讯作者:
Followill, David
DOI:
10.1093/jnci/88.5.270
发表时间:
1996-03-06
期刊:
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
影响因子:
--
作者:
Hawkins, MM;Wilson, LMK;Stovall, MA
通讯作者:
Stovall, MA