Seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among Veterans Affairs healthcare system employees suggests higher risk of infection when exposed to SARS-CoV-2 outside the work environment.

Seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among Veterans Affairs healthcare system employees suggests higher risk of infection when exposed to SARS-CoV-2 outside the work environment.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1017/ice.2020.1220
复制
发表时间:
2021-04
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Bradley SF
Bradley SF
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dimcheff DE;Schildhouse RJ;Hausman MS;Vincent BM;Markovitz E;Chensue SW;Deng J;McLeod M;Hagan D;Russell J;Bradley SF

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统的员工中评估严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)IgG抗体的血清阳性率,以评估传播和感染的潜在危险因素。所有员工都被邀请参加问卷调查和血清学调查,以检测SARS-CoV-2抗体,作为全机构质量改进和感染预防计划的一部分,无论临床或非临床职责如何。该计划于二零二零年六月八日至七月八日进行。在2,900名员工中,51%参与了研究,显示SARS-CoV-2血清阳性率为4.9%(1,476人中有72人; 95%CI,3.8%-6.1%)。基于性别、年龄、前线工作人员身份、职称、气溶胶生成程序的性能或在医院内接触2019冠状病毒感染性疾病(COVID-19)的已知患者,抗体的存在没有统计学显著差异。报告在工作之外暴露于已知COVID-19病例的员工的血清阳性率为14.8%(155人中的23人),显著高于未暴露于已知COVID-19病例的员工的3.7%(1,296人中的48人; OR,4.53; 95%CI,2.67-7.68; P < .0001)。值得注意的是,29%的血清反应阳性员工报告没有SARS-CoV-2感染的症状史。在提供直接患者护理的员工和不提供直接患者护理的员工中,SARS-CoV-2血清阳性率没有显着差异,这表明全机构的感染控制措施是有效的。报告在工作之外与COVID-19阳性人员直接接触的员工更有可能感染SARS-CoV-2抗体。员工在工作之外接触SARS-CoV-2可能会将感染引入医院。
The seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) IgG antibody was evaluated among employees of a Veterans Affairs healthcare system to assess potential risk factors for transmission and infection. All employees were invited to participate in a questionnaire and serological survey to detect antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 as part of a facility-wide quality improvement and infection prevention initiative regardless of clinical or nonclinical duties. The initiative was conducted from June 8 to July 8, 2020. Of the 2,900 employees, 51% participated in the study, revealing a positive SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence of 4.9% (72 of 1,476; 95% CI, 3.8%–6.1%). There were no statistically significant differences in the presence of antibody based on gender, age, frontline worker status, job title, performance of aerosol-generating procedures, or exposure to known patients with coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) within the hospital. Employees who reported exposure to a known COVID-19 case outside work had a significantly higher seroprevalence at 14.8% (23 of 155) compared to those who did not 3.7% (48 of 1,296; OR, 4.53; 95% CI, 2.67–7.68; P < .0001). Notably, 29% of seropositive employees reported no history of symptoms for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among employees was not significantly different among those who provided direct patient care and those who did not, suggesting that facility-wide infection control measures were effective. Employees who reported direct personal contact with COVID-19–positive persons outside work were more likely to have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Employee exposure to SARS-CoV-2 outside work may introduce infection into hospitals.
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0949-6
发表时间: 2020-06-05
期刊: NATURE MEDICINE
影响因子: 82.9
作者:
Xu, Xin;Sun, Jian;Hou, Fan Fan
通讯作者: Hou, Fan Fan
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.067
发表时间: 2020-09-01
影响因子: 28.2
作者:
Chen, Yuxin;Tong, Xin;Wu, Chao
通讯作者: Wu, Chao
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104512
发表时间: 2020-08-01
影响因子: 8.8
作者:
Jaaskelainen, A. J.;Kuivanen, S.;Lappalainen, M.
通讯作者: Lappalainen, M.
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00941-20
发表时间: 2020-08-01
影响因子: 9.4
作者:
Bryan, Andrew;Pepper, Gregory;Greninger, Alexander L.
通讯作者: Greninger, Alexander L.