Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT
Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT
复制标题
Rb-82 心肌灌注 3D PET/CT 中的即时伽玛补偿
DOI:
10.1007/s12350-009-9170-1
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
J. Votaw
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Esteves;J. Nye;Akbar Khan;R. Folks;R. Halkar;Ernest V. Garcia;D. Schuster;S. Lerakis;P. Raggi;J. Votaw
ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic accuracy of Rb-82 myocardial perfusion three-dimensional (3D) PET with and without prompt-gamma compensation (PGC).Methods and resultsRetrospective, single center study of 76 patients who had rest and adenosine stress Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET. All studies were acquired using a Siemens Biograph-40 PET/CT scanner and were reconstructed with and without PGC. Fifty-seven patients (mean age 63 ± 11 years, 26 men) had coronary angiography within 40 days of Rb-82 imaging. Nineteen patients (mean age 43 ± 7 years, 10 men) had low likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD). All PET images were scored by consensus of two blinded readers on a standard 5-point scale using a 17-segment left ventricular model. A normal PET test was defined as a summed stress score of less than four. Obstructive CAD at coronary angiography was used as the gold-standard and was defined as luminal stenoses ≥50% in one or more major coronary arteries. The prevalence of obstructive disease at coronary angiography was 68% (39/57). The mean summed stress score was 12 ± 12 for PGC images and was 18 ± 14 for non-PGC images. Sensitivity and specificity for obstructive CAD were 90% (95% CI 88-99) and 72% (95% CI 52-93) for PGC images and 95% (95% CI 88-100) and 22% (95% CI 3-41) for non-PGC images.ConclusionPGC in Rb-82 3D PET improves the specificity for obstructive CAD at coronary angiography with no significant loss in sensitivity.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
VanTrain,KF;Areeda,J;Garcia,EV;Cooke,CD;Maddahi,J;Kiat,H;Germano,G;Silagan,G;Folks,R;Berman,DS
通讯作者:
Berman,DS
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
STEWART, RE;SCHWAIGER, M;KUHL, DE
通讯作者:
KUHL, DE
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Beattie, BJ;Finn, RD;Pentlow, KS
通讯作者:
Pentlow, KS