Reuse in STEM research writing
Reuse in STEM research writing
复制标题
STEM 研究写作中的重用
DOI：
10.1075/aila.00033.ans
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
0.4
通讯作者：
Cary Moskovitz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chris M. Anson;S. Hall;Michael Pemberton;Cary Moskovitz
摘要文本回收（以下简称TR），有时也被称为“自我剽窃”，涉及在新创建的文本中逐字重复使用自己现有文档中的文本-例如在新文章中复制已发表文章的段落或部分。虽然学术界和出版业广泛避免剽窃，但TR的道德规范尚未达成一致，目前正在激烈辩论。作为联邦政府资助的（美国）国家科学基金会赠款的一部分，我们一直在研究TR模式使用几种方法，包括采访有关TR价值观和实践的编辑（Pemberton，Hall，Moskovitz，&安森，2019）和数字介导的文本分析过程，以确定TR在生物科学，工程，数学和物理科学以及社会的学术出版物中的程度，行为和经济科学（安森，莫斯科维茨，&安森，2019）。在这篇文章中，我们首先描述和说明TR在学术写作的背景下。然后，我们解释并记录了几个主题，这些主题是从与同行评审的学术期刊出版商的访谈中出现的。这些主题表明了TR作为学术写作和出版中的一种话语现象的烦恼和不稳定的性质。在这样做时，我们专注于科学出版物的个人（基于角色）和社会（基于规范）方面之间的复杂关系，使写作过程的传统模型复杂化，这些模型不足以解释作者关于准确性，效率，自我表达，遵守现有或想象的规则和规范，对所有权和版权的看法以及对不当行为的恐惧。
Abstract Text recycling (hereafter TR), sometimes problematically called “self-plagiarism,” involves the verbatim reuse of text from one’s own existing documents in a newly created text – such as the duplication of a paragraph or section from a published article in a new article. Although plagiarism is widely eschewed across academia and the publishing industry, the ethics of TR are not agreed upon and are currently being vigorously debated. As part of a federally funded (US) National Science Foundation grant, we have been studying TR patterns using several methodologies, including interviews with editors about TR values and practices (Pemberton, Hall, Moskovitz, & Anson, 2019) and digitally mediated text-analytic processes to determine the extent of TR in academic publications in the biological sciences, engineering, mathematical and physical sciences, and social, behavioral, and economic sciences (Anson, Moskovitz, & Anson, 2019). In this article, we first describe and illustrate TR in the context of academic writing. We then explain and document several themes that emerged from interviews with publishers of peer-reviewed academic journals. These themes demonstrate the vexed and unsettled nature of TR as a discursive phenomenon in academic writing and publishing. In doing so, we focus on the complex relationships between personal (role-based) and social (norm-based) aspects of scientific publication, complicating conventional models of the writing process that have inadequately accounted for authorial decisions about accuracy, efficiency, self-representation, adherence to existing or imagined rules and norms, perceptions of ownership and copyright, and fears of impropriety.
文本回收：基于访谈的研究中北美期刊编辑的观点
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Pemberton, Michael;Hall, Susanne;Moskovitz, Cary;Anson, Chris M.
通讯作者：
Anson, Chris M.
识别 STEM 研究报告中文本循环的文本分析方法
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
The journal of writing analytics
影响因子：
--
作者：
Anson, Ian G;Moskovitz, Cary;Anson, Chris M
通讯作者：
Anson, Chris M
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Moskovitz，Cary
通讯作者：
Moskovitz，Cary