Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK.

Understanding COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/hex.13240
复制
发表时间:
2021-08
期刊:
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory Group
Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory Group
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lockyer B;Islam S;Rahman A;Dickerson J;Pickett K;Sheldon T;Wright J;McEachan R;Sheard L;Bradford Institute for Health Research Covid-19 Scientific Advisory Group

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

新冠疫苗可为摆脱疫情提供一条途径,然而初步研究表明,许多人不愿意接种疫苗。错误信息传播的增加被认为在疫苗犹豫方面起到了重要作用。为了最大限度地提高接种率,了解为什么错误信息此时能够盛行以及为什么它在某些情况下可能构成更严重的问题是很重要的。 为了解人们对新冠的看法、他们在新冠期间与(错误)信息的互动以及对新冠疫苗的态度。 英国布拉德福德被选为研究地点,以便为当地决策者提供证据。2020年秋季,对来自布拉德福德不同族裔群体和地区的20人进行了深入的电话访谈。进行了反思性主题分析。 参与者讨论了他们遇到的各种各样的新冠错误信息,这些信息导致了困惑、痛苦和不信任。疫苗犹豫可归因于三个突出因素:安全担忧、负面报道和个人认知。在疫情期间,参与者对其社会环境感到越困惑、痛苦和不信任,他们对疫苗的态度就越不积极。 需要在错误信息传播和相关情绪反应之间的关系背景下理解新冠疫苗犹豫现象。疫苗接种计划应提供有针对性、本地化和富有同理心的应对措施来抵制错误信息。 开展了一个快速的社区和利益相关者参与过程,以确定对布拉德福德市民和决策者重要的新冠优先议题。
COVID‐19 vaccines can offer a route out of the pandemic, yet initial research suggests that many are unwilling to be vaccinated. A rise in the spread of misinformation is thought to have played a significant role in vaccine hesitancy. To maximize uptake, it is important to understand why misinformation has been able to take hold at this time and why it may pose a more significant problem within certain contexts. To understand people's COVID‐19 beliefs, their interactions with (mis)information during COVID‐19 and attitudes towards a COVID‐19 vaccine. Bradford, UK, was chosen as the study site to provide evidence to local decision makers. In‐depth phone interviews were carried out with 20 people from different ethnic groups and areas of Bradford during Autumn 2020. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. Participants discussed a wide range of COVID‐19 misinformation they had encountered, resulting in confusion, distress and mistrust. Vaccine hesitancy could be attributed to three prominent factors: safety concerns, negative stories and personal knowledge. The more confused, distressed and mistrusting participants felt about their social worlds during the pandemic, the less positive they were about a vaccine. COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy needs to be understood in the context of the relationship between the spread of misinformation and associated emotional reactions. Vaccine programmes should provide a focused, localized and empathetic response to counter misinformation. A rapid community and stakeholder engagement process was undertaken to identify COVID‐19 priority topics important to Bradford citizens and decision makers.
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040620
发表时间: 2020-01-01
期刊: BMJ OPEN
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Jia, Ru;Ayling, Kieran;Vedhara, Kavita
通讯作者: Vedhara, Kavita
DOI: 10.1080/25741292.2020.1837466
发表时间: 2021-01-02
影响因子: 7
作者:
Cairney, Paul;Wellstead, Adam
通讯作者: Wellstead, Adam
DOI: 10.2196/20477
发表时间: 2020-09-22
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Khurshid A
通讯作者: Khurshid A
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16129.1
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: --
作者:
McEachan RRC;Dickerson J;Bridges S;Bryant M;Cartwright C;Islam S;Lockyer B;Rahman A;Sheard L;West J;Lawlor DA;Sheldon TA;Wright J;Pickett KE;Bradford Institute for Health Research COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Group
通讯作者: Bradford Institute for Health Research COVID-19 Scientific Advisory Group
Covid-19疫苗犹豫不决与对英国和土耳其新颖冠状病毒的起源的信念有关。
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720004067
发表时间: 2020-10-19
影响因子: 6.9
作者:
Salali GD;Uysal MS
通讯作者: Uysal MS