Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score.

Agreement of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium from low-dose CT attenuation correction scans in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT with standard Agatston score.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.057
复制
发表时间:
2010-11-30
影响因子:
24
通讯作者:
Berman, Daniel S.
Berman, Daniel S.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Einstein, Andrew J.;Johnson, Lynne L.;Bokhari, Sabahat;Son, Jessica;Thompson, Randall C.;Bateman, Timothy M.;Hayes, Sean W.;Berman, Daniel S.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

我们试图评价通过混合PET/CT和SPECT/CT心肌灌注成像(MPI)进行的CT衰减校正(CTAC)扫描对冠状动脉钙(CAC)进行视觉估计的准确性和再现性。在MPI时,混合系统获得用于执行衰减校正的低剂量、非ECG门控CT扫描。以前没有研究过这种CTAC扫描在估计实际CAC(通过标准ECG门控扫描上的Agatston评分(AS)测量)中的效用。研究了来自3个中心的492名接受MPI和CTAC以及标准CAC扫描的患者。在每家临床试验机构,对AS设盲的经验丰富的阅片者审查了CTAC图像,在6级量表上目视估计CAC:将患者分类为估计AS 0、1-9、10-99、100-300、400-999或≥1000。视觉估计CAC(VECAC)对CTAC和AS之间的协议,测量标准偏差并转换为相同的规模,进行了评估,因为是读者之间的协议。虽然CTAC图像是低剂量和非门控的,但在VECAC和AS之间观察到高度相关性,63%的VECAC与AS类别相同,93%的VECAC在一个类别内。加权kappa为0.89(95%置信区间为0.88至0.91,p<0.0001)。观察到每个部位、扫描仪类型和性别的高加权kappa统计量。65%的读者报告了相同的分数,93%的读者报告了同一类别的分数。CAC可以通过低剂量CTAC扫描进行视觉评估,与AS高度一致。CTAC扫描应定期评估VECAC。
We sought to evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of coronary artery calcium (CAC) from CT attenuation correction (CTAC) scans performed for hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). At the time of MPI, hybrid systems obtain a low-dose, non-ECG-gated CT scan that is used to perform attenuation correction. Utility of this CTAC scan in estimating actual CAC as measured by Agatston score (AS) on standard ECG-gated scans has not been previously studied. 492 patients from 3 centers receiving both MPI with CTAC and a standard CAC scan were studied. At each site, experienced readers blinded to AS reviewed CTAC images, visually estimating CAC on a six-level scale: classifying patients as estimated AS of 0, 1-9, 10-99, 100-300, 400-999, or ≥1000. Agreement between visually-estimated CAC (VECAC) on CTAC and AS, measured standardly and converted to the same scale, was evaluated, as was inter-reader agreement. Although CTAC images are low-dose and non-gated, a high degree of association was observed between VECAC and AS, with 63% of VECACs in the same category as the AS category and 93% within one category. Weighted kappa was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.91, p<0.0001). High weighted kappa statistics were observed for each site, scanner type, and gender. Readers reported identical scores in 65% of cases and scores within one category in 93%. CAC can be visually assessed from low-dose CTAC scans with high agreement with AS. CTAC scans should be routinely assessed for VECAC.
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.162
发表时间: 2009-07-13
影响因子: --
作者:
Kim, Kwang Pyo;Einstein, Andrew J.;de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
通讯作者: de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.0000027136.56615.de
发表时间: 2002-07-30
期刊: CIRCULATION
影响因子: 37.8
作者:
Horton, KM;Post, WS;Fishman, EK
通讯作者: Fishman, EK
DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t
发表时间: 1990-03-15
影响因子: 24
作者:
AGATSTON, AS;JANOWITZ, WR;DETRANO, R
通讯作者: DETRANO, R
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/10/003
发表时间: 2008-05-21
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Hamann, M.;Aldridge, M.;Hutton, B. F.
通讯作者: Hutton, B. F.
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0278-2
发表时间: 2007-01-01
期刊: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Horiguchi, Jun;Fukuda, Hiroshi;Ito, Katsuhide
通讯作者: Ito, Katsuhide