Eccentricity effects in vision and attention.

Eccentricity effects in vision and attention.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.020
复制
发表时间:
2016-11
期刊:
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Vangkilde S
Vangkilde S
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Staugaard CF;Petersen A;Vangkilde S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

刺激偏心以多种方式影响视觉处理。与视网膜周边相比,当目标刺激呈现在中心凹附近或在中心凹时,视觉任务的表现往往更好。例如,反应时间和错误率经常被报告为随着偏心率的增加而增加。这些发现被解释为纯粹的视觉,反映了中枢和外周视觉以及注意力的神经生理学差异,反映了注意力资源分配的中央偏见。其他发现表明,在某些情况下,来自外围的信息被优先处理。具体地说,已经提出,视觉处理速度随着刺激偏心率的增加而增加,并且当刺激激活的皮层的量通过放大外围刺激而保持恒定时,这种正相关性被降低,但不是消除(Carrasco等人,2003)。在这项研究中,我们使用基于Bundesen(1990)的视觉注意理论的计算模型,研究了偏心在放大和不放大的情况下对视觉注意能力的影响。我们的结果表明,无论放大倍数如何,随着刺激偏心率的增加,注意力能力普遍下降。我们讨论了与视觉系统的生理学有关的这些结果,使用不同的范式来研究视野中的视觉感知,以及使用不同的刺激材料(例如,Gabor贴片与字母)。对字母刺激的视觉能力向视觉外围递减。视觉能力的下降与大脑皮质的放大程度无关。外周表现可能取决于特定的刺激和任务需求。
Stimulus eccentricity affects visual processing in multiple ways. Performance on a visual task is often better when target stimuli are presented near or at the fovea compared to the retinal periphery. For instance, reaction times and error rates are often reported to increase with increasing eccentricity. Such findings have been interpreted as purely visual, reflecting neurophysiological differences in central and peripheral vision, as well as attentional, reflecting a central bias in the allocation of attentional resources. Other findings indicate that in some cases, information from the periphery is preferentially processed. Specifically, it has been suggested that visual processing speed increases with increasing stimulus eccentricity, and that this positive correlation is reduced, but not eliminated, when the amount of cortex activated by a stimulus is kept constant by magnifying peripheral stimuli (Carrasco et al., 2003). In this study, we investigated effects of eccentricity on visual attentional capacity with and without magnification, using computational modeling based on Bundesen's (1990) theory of visual attention. Our results suggest a general decrease in attentional capacity with increasing stimulus eccentricity, irrespective of magnification. We discuss these results in relation to the physiology of the visual system, the use of different paradigms for investigating visual perception across the visual field, and the use of different stimulus materials (e.g. Gabor patches vs. letters). Visual capacity for letter stimuli decreases toward the visual periphery. The decrease in visual capacity is irrespective of cortical magnification. Peripheral performance might depend on the specific stimuli and task demands.
DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00069-6
发表时间: 2002-01-01
期刊: NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Omtzigt, D;Hendriks, AW;Kolk, HHJ
通讯作者: Kolk, HHJ
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021584
发表时间: 2011
期刊: PloS one
影响因子: 3.7
作者:
Bayle DJ;Schoendorff B;Hénaff MA;Krolak-Salmon P
通讯作者: Krolak-Salmon P
DOI: 10.3758/bf03208380
发表时间: 1995-11-01
期刊: PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS
影响因子: --
作者:
CARRASCO, M;EVERT, DL;KATZ, SM
通讯作者: KATZ, SM
DOI: 10.1068/p6849
发表时间: 2011-01-01
期刊: PERCEPTION
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
Guo, Kun;Liu, Chang Hong;Roebuck, Hettie
通讯作者: Roebuck, Hettie
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2572-11.2011
发表时间: 2011-09-21
影响因子: 5.3
作者:
Harvey, Ben M.;Dumoulin, Serge O.
通讯作者: Dumoulin, Serge O.