Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests.
Effect of remote online exam delivery on student experience and performance in applied knowledge tests.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12909-021-02521-1
复制
发表时间：
2021-02-02
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Kluth D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jaap A;Dewar A;Duncan C;Fairhurst K;Hope D;Kluth D
在医学教育中，远程在线交付总结性评估的使用尚未得到充分探索。由于COVID-19疫情，英国一所医学院的所有年终应用知识多项选择题（MCQ）考试均由校内改为远程评估。我们进行了一项在线调查，了解远程考试的学生体验，并比较了两个学年内4年级和5年级学生在远程与监考校园形式的类似评估中的考试表现。很少有学生在远程完成考试时遇到技术或实际问题。一些学生的考试焦虑减少了，但另一些学生则增加了。大多数学生更喜欢在计算机实验室监考的传统设置，认为这确保了所有考生的公平竞争。四年级学生在远程交付的平均得分高于校园形式的同一考试（76.53% [SD 6.57] vs. 72.81% [6.64]; t438.38 = 5.94，p = 0.001; d = 0.56），而考生的表现是在两种形式的五年级学生相当。远程在线MCQ考试交付是一种有效且普遍接受的终结性评估方法，如果现场交付不可能，将来可以再次使用，而不会对学生造成损害。
The use of remote online delivery of summative assessments has been underexplored in medical education. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all end of year applied knowledge multiple choice question (MCQ) tests at one UK medical school were switched from on campus to remote assessments. We conducted an online survey of student experience with remote exam delivery and compared test performance in remote versus invigilated campus-based forms of similar assessments for Year 4 and 5 students across two academic years. Very few students experienced technical or practical problems in completing their exam remotely. Test anxiety was reduced for some students but increased for others. The majority of students preferred the traditional setting of invigilated exams in a computer lab, feeling this ensured an even playing field for all candidates. Mean score was higher for Year 4 students in the remotely-delivered versus campus-based form of the same exam (76.53% [SD 6.57] vs. 72.81% [6.64]; t438.38 = 5.94, p = 0.001; d = 0.56), whereas candidate performance was equivalent across both forms for Year 5 students. Remote online MCQ exam delivery is an effective and generally acceptable approach to summative assessment, and could be used again in future without detriment to students if onsite delivery is not possible.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.6
作者：
Derakshan, Nazanin;Eysenck, Michael W.
通讯作者：
Eysenck, Michael W.
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Fuller, Richard;Joynes, Viktoria;Roberts, Trudie
通讯作者：
Roberts, Trudie
影响因子：
5
作者：
Beck, Victoria
通讯作者：
Beck, Victoria
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
COHEN, J
通讯作者：
COHEN, J
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Jervis, Christopher G.;Brown, Leo R.
通讯作者：
Brown, Leo R.