Collaborative Research: Congressional Committee Jurisdictions, Gatekeeping, and Agenda Setting

对国会结构的研究经常集中在众议院和参议院常设委员会的权力和权威上。 从理论的角度来看，委员会要么是国会政策过程的基础和核心，就像在立法结构的分配模型中一样，要么被视为向党或议院等上级机构提供信息和政策建议的重要主力，就像在党派和信息模型中所描述的那样。 从一个更实证的角度来看，最近的国会观察家们对立法委员会相对于其他国会行为者，特别是众议院和政党领导人的当代地位存在分歧。尽管该领域的一些最好的学者声称委员会在国会决策过程中的优势或劣势，我们仍然没有什么方法来衡量委员会的权力和权威，特别是如果我们试图了解特定小组的影响力随时间的变化。 该项目通过收集关于法案介绍和转介的新数据纠正了这一缺陷。 这使得调查人员能够更准确地定义委员会的管辖权，更好地测试管辖权变化的理论，了解委员会问题把关的过程和流行程度，并发现个人和委员会议程对国会两院整体工作的影响。研究人员收集了1947年至2000年国会提出的所有法案的信息。 基于目前对国会组织和政策决策的研究，调查人员描述了法案介绍和转介的数据如何回答有关委员会权威和政策议程设置的广泛问题。 例如，关于法案转介的信息提供了一个更完整的“普通法”委员会管辖范围的划分，使学者们超越了小组正在积极处理的问题（举行听证会），而更多地考虑了小组有权转介的问题，因为这些问题可能仍然不活跃（不举行听证会）。 同样，委员会中“非决策”的信息使研究人员首次能够真正测试委员会在小组中的把关模式，以及程序规则和结构的变化。（法案介绍）与现有的政策需求信息（公众舆论和媒体线索）和政府产出（法令和预算授权），他们能够研究委员会权力的动态和对立法议程的影响，更全面地描述国会决策。 该数据集将对许多其他对这一主题感兴趣的学者具有重要价值。

Studies of congressional structure frequently focus on the powers and authority of standing committees in the House and Senate. From a theoretical perspective, committees are either the foundation and core of the policy process in congress as in a distributive model of legislative structure, or are seen as the vital workhorse in providing information and policy proposals to parent bodies like the party or chamber as described in partisan and informational models. From a more empirical standpoint, recent observers of Congress have disagreed about the contemporary status of legislative committees vis-a-vis other congressional actors, particularly chamber and party leaders.Despite the claims of some of the field's best scholars as to current strengths or weaknesses of committees in the congressional decision making process, we still have few means by which to measure the power and authority of committees, particularly if we seek to understand the changes in influence of specific panels over time. This project rectifies this shortcoming by gathering new data on bill introductions and referrals. This allows the investigators to more accurately define committee jurisdictions, better test theories of jurisdictional change, understand the process and prevalence of committee issue gatekeeping, and discover the effects of individual and committee agendas on the overall work of each chamber of Congress.The researchers collect information on all bills introduced in Congress from 1947-2000. Grounded in current research on congressional organization and policy decision making, the investigators describe how data on bill introductions and referrals can answer a wide range of questions concerning committee authority and policy agenda setting. For example, information on bill referrals provides a more complete delineation of "common law" committee jurisdictions by moving scholars beyond simply those issues on which a panel is active (holding hearings), to additional consideration of those matters on which it has referral authority by may remain inactive (no hearings). Similarly, information on "non-decisionmaking" in committees allows the researchers for the first time to truly test models of committee gatekeeping across panels and over changes in procedural rules and structures.By integrating data on policy "inputs" (bill introductions) with existing information on policy demand (public opinion and media cues) and governmental outputs (enactments and budget authorizations), they are able to study the dynamics of committee authority and influence over the legislative agenda with a more comprehensive depiction of congressional decision making. The dataset will be of great value to numerous other scholars interested in this topic.