课题基金 / 基金详情

Process Matters: Legislative Procedure in the United Nations General Assembly

Process Matters: Legislative Procedure in the United Nations General Assembly
程序事项:联合国大会的立法程序
批准号:
1625064
负责人:
Courtenay Conrad
金额:
$11.86万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017-08-01 至 2018-07-31

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
本项目提出,将大会视为一个立法机构,特别是通过关注其过程和程序,可以大大扩展我们对国家行为和在国际组织中的影响力的理解。 美国每年在联合国有关活动上花费数千万美元。 该项目提供了一个新的理解的潜在途径,可能会改变国家安全和其他外交局势的结果在未来。 通过更好地解释国家行为背后的逻辑和动机,它可以为美国决策者提供一个更明智的手段,从战略上引导联合国的道路,以取得成功的结果。大量的国际关系文献关注联合国大会的唱名表决结果。联合国大会促进各国在国际体系中的合作,并为各国发出重要信号提供论坛。该机构帮助各国管理集体资源,降低联合决策的交易成本,并增加有关战争与和平的决策的透明度。为了了解国家偏好是如何在联合国内部汇总的,学者们将注意力集中在过程结束时的通过投票上。但最终的收养只有一个?可以说小?故事的一部分;联合国大会中发生的许多冲突和谈判都发生在议程项目和决议到达全体会议之前。因此,该项目将有助于更好地了解未被发现的权力来源和冲突层面。
英文摘要
This project proposes that thinking of the assembly as a legislature-specifically by focusing on its process and procedure-can significantly expand our understanding of state behavior and influence in international organizations. The United States spends tens of millions of dollars on United Nations related activities each year. This project provides a potential avenue of new understanding that could alter the outcome of national security and other diplomatic situations in the future. By better explaining the logic and motives behind state behavior, it could provide US decision makers with a more informed means of strategically navigating UN pathways to successful outcomes.A wealth of international relations literature focuses on roll call voting outcomes in the United Nations General Assembly. The United Nations General Assembly facilitates cooperation between states in the international system and provides a forum for states to send important signals. The institution helps states manage collective resources, lowers the transaction costs of joint decision-making, and increases the transparency with which decisions are made regarding war and peace. In order to understand how state preferences are aggregated within the United Nations, scholars have focused much attention on adoption votes at the end of the process. But final adoption is only one?arguably small?part of the story; much of the conflict and negotiation that occurs in the UNGA happens before agenda items and resolutions ever reach the plenary floor. This project will thus help better understand the uncover sources of power and dimensions of conflict that have gone undetected.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金