Commentary on 2 Corinthians

德语版的《哥林多后书》最近没有任何评论，这本书符合学术标准。这个项目的目的是编写《布道-Katholischer Kommentar》系列评论的第二卷，我已于2010年出版了第一卷。本系列的具体简介要求包括圣经经文的“Wirkungsgeschichte”(解释和其他影响的历史)。有很多准备工作要做。被申请的合作者将负责重建《Wirkungsgeschichte》，不是随机的，也不是全面的，而是从两个具体的角度：1.教会父亲如何评判哥林多后书的修辞(奥纳托斯、论点结构、修辞体裁)？在判断最近的修辞文本分析时，我们能从中得到帮助吗？2.在《哥林多后书》10-13节中扮演重要角色的力量和软弱的神学概念在教化前的解释中是如何相互联系的？改革以来，有哪些教派的口译模式得到了发展？除了一名合作者，我正在申请一名替代者，让我可以多花一个假期学期来写我的评论第二卷。申请的六个月中的一个月，我将作为访问学者在美国佐治亚州的埃默里大学度过。我已经和这个机构接触了很多年了。与同事和博士生的学术讨论已经对以前的研究项目产生了重要影响。

There is no recent commentary on 2 Corinthians in German which is living up to scholarly standards. The aim of this project is to write the second volume of a commentary in the "Evangelisch-Katholischer Kommentar" series the first volume of which I have published in 2010. The specific profile of this series requires including the "Wirkungsgeschichte" (history of interpretations and other effects) of the biblical text. There is a lot of preparatory work to be done. The collaborator who is being applied for will be in charge of reconstructing the "Wirkungsgeschichte" not at random or in a comprehensive way but following two specific perspectives:1. How do church fathers judge the rhetoric of 2 Corinthians (ornatus, structure of argument, rhetorical genre)? Can we gain help from this in judging recent rhetorical text analyses?2. How do the theological concepts of power and weakness which play a prominent role in 2Cor 10-13 relate to each other in pre-reformatory interpretations? Which denominational patterns of interpretation have developed since the reformation?Besides a collaborator I am applying for a replacement which allows me to spend an additional sabbatical semester working at the second volume of my commentary. One of the six months applied for I will spend as a visiting scholar at Emory University, Georgia (USA). I have been in contact with this institution for many years. Scholarly discussions with colleagues and PhD-students there have already had essential impact on former research projects.