课题基金 / 基金详情

GCR: Collaborative Research: Jumpstarting Successful Open-Source Software Projects With Evidence-Based Rules and Structures

GCR: Collaborative Research: Jumpstarting Successful Open-Source Software Projects With Evidence-Based Rules and Structures
GCR:协作研究:利用基于证据的规则和结构启动成功的开源软件项目
批准号:
2020900
负责人:
Charles Schweik
金额:
$125.89万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Continuing Grant
财政年份:
2020
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2020-10-01 至 2025-09-30

项目摘要

项目成果

Charles Schweik的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
开源软件(OSS)是一个价值数十亿美元的行业。超过80%的企业,包括所有主要的科技公司,都依赖于OSS。事实上,这种软件被用于数字生活的许多方面,例如,浏览社交网络、文档编辑、银行、网站托管等。尽管这种流行吸引了许多程序员开源,但超过90%的OSS项目被放弃,特别是较小和较年轻的项目。先前的工作已经在两个非常不同的领域研究了这种情况的原因。在软件工程中,重点是从社会技术的角度理解成功和可持续性:OSS程序员的日常活动和他们创建的工件。另一方面,在组织管理/政策文献中,重点一直放在体制设计上(例如,政策、规则和规范)。但两者之间的联系和互动几乎没有被探索。 在该项目中,由经验数据科学和软件工程、认知科学、政治学和公共政策专家组成的聚合研究小组将开发一个聚合分析框架,将开放源码软件项目的社会技术任务结构与其治理和制度设计统一起来,以了解项目,特别是新生项目,是否可能成功和自我维持。该团队将专注于非营利支持的项目,如Apache软件基金会下的项目,并将在整个项目中积极参与开源社区,为研究提供信息并探索应用程序和结果。拟议的工作将推进软件工程的理论和实践,特别是因为它关系到理解开放源码软件项目的成功和有效性,这些目标对国家竞争力至关重要。该项目的主要广泛影响在于其加强已融入社会结构的技术的潜力。在这个项目中,融合视角是一个统一的框架,融合了社会技术结构和项目治理。该小组认为,通过已经成功或被放弃的类似项目提供的背景,可以在该框架中理解单个OSS项目的轨迹。这项研究将结合联合收割机建立和新的定性和定量技术,以辨别社会技术结构和治理条件下,开放源码软件项目是最有效的(和最不),并提供可操作的知识,开发人员,定制有效的项目实践,他们的环境。智力挑战既存在于这些领域,也存在于将这些领域与来自软件工程、管理和政策的零散文献相结合的过程中。该奖项反映了NSF的法定使命,并通过使用基金会的智力价值和更广泛的影响审查标准进行评估,被认为值得支持。
英文摘要
Open Source Software (OSS) is a multi-billion dollar industry. Over 80% of businesses, including all major tech companies, rely on OSS. In fact, such software is used in many aspects of digital life, e.g., browsing the social web, document editing, banking, website hosting, etc. Even though this popularity attracts many programmers to open source, more than 90% of OSS projects are abandoned, especially the smaller and younger projects. Prior work has looked at the reasons for this in two very different fields. In software engineering, the focus has been on understanding success and sustainability from the socio-technical perspective: the OSS programmers’ day to day activities and the artifacts they create. In the organizational management/policy literature, on the other hand, emphasis has been on institutional designs (e.g., policies, rules, and norms) that structure governance. But the connection and interaction between the two has been barely explored. In this project, a convergent research team comprised of experts in empirical data science and software engineering, cognitive science, political science, and public policy will develop a convergent analysis framework that unifies the socio-technical task structure of OSS projects with their governance and institutional design, in order to understand if projects, especially nascent ones, are likely to be successful and self-sustaining. The team will focus on nonprofit-supported projects, like those under the Apache Software Foundation, and will actively engage the open-source communities throughout the project, both to inform the research and to explore applications and results. The proposed work will advance the theory and practice of software engineering, especially as it relates to understanding success and effectiveness of OSS projects, goals that are critical to national competitiveness. The primary broader impact of the project lies in its potential to strengthen a technology that has become woven into the fabric of society. In this project, the convergence perspective is a unified framework, fusing the socio-technical structure and project governance. The team posits that trajectories of individual OSS projects can be understood in that framework through the context provided by similar projects that already have succeeded or been abandoned. This research will combine established and novel qualitative and quantitative techniques to discern the socio-technical structural and governance conditions under which OSS projects are most (and least) effective, and provide actionable knowledge to developers, to customize efficient project practices to their environment. The intellectual challenges lie both in these areas as well as in the integration of these with the scattered literature from software engineering, management and policy.This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.
期刊论文(8)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
DOI: 10.1145/3540250.3549132
发表时间: 2022-11
期刊: Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
影响因子: --
作者: [Stefan Stanciulescu;Likang Yin;V. Filkov]
通讯作者: Stefan Stanciulescu;Likang Yin;V. Filkov
Governing online goods: Maturity and formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and World of Warcraft communities
管理在线商品:《我的世界》、Reddit 和《魔兽世界》社区的成熟度和正规化
DOI: --
发表时间: 2022
期刊: arXivorg
影响因子: --
作者: [Frey, S., Zhong, Q., Bulat, B., Weisman, W.D., Liu, C., Fujimoto, S., Wang, H.M., Schweik, C.M.]
通讯作者: Schweik, C.M.
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-021-00423-w
发表时间: 2021
期刊: Voluntas
影响因子: 2.4
作者: [Bushouse, B, Schweik, C., Siddiki, S., Rice, D., Wolfson, I.]
通讯作者: Wolfson, I.
Cui Bono: Do Open Source Software Incubator Policies and Procedures Benefit the Projects or the Incubator?
Cui Bono:开源软件孵化器政策和程序对项目或孵化器有利吗?
DOI: 10.5334/ijc.1176
发表时间: 2022
期刊: The international journal of the commons
影响因子: --
作者: [Sen, A., Atkisson, C., Schweik, C]
通讯作者: Schweik, C
共 7 条
    Support for the Open Source Systems 2011 Doctoral Consortium
    • 批准号:
      1132151
    • 项目类别:
      Standard Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $2.14万
    • 财政年份:
      2011
    • 负责人:
      Charles Schweik
    • 依托单位:
    CAREER: The Open Source/Content Commons as a New Paradigm for Collaborative Scientific Research: A Research and Teaching Agenda
    • 批准号:
      0447623
    • 项目类别:
      Continuing Grant
    • 资助金额:
      $49.77万
    • 财政年份:
      2005
    • 负责人:
      Charles Schweik
    • 依托单位:
    海外基金