Max Scheler. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie (1913/1923)Final support Editionproject

Max Schelers Wesen und Formender同情的版本渴望成为这一文本的批判性出版物。在这样一个版本的基础上，它将有可能以适当的方式将这一文本与哲学史以及哲学研究的系统性联系起来。此外，目前关于情感哲学的讨论将获得可靠的基础，这一点对这部著作来说是重要的。因此，关于马克斯·舍勒的研究讨论，以及实际争论中的跨学科研究领域，都落在一个版本上，这个版本在语言学和科学上是有保证的，但到目前为止还没有。聚焦于谢勒斯韦森和福曼和同情，这是一个理想的图腾，因为在1913年的第一版和1923年的第二版之间有很大的差异。显然，这表现在范围的扩大上：第一版有153页，第二版有307页。最有趣的是，谢勒关于同情情感的表现及其与道德的相关性，从而在不同形式的社会关系背景下成功地自我表现的现象学著作，参与了哲学中的实际讨论(例如，关于集体意向性的辩论，关于共同情感的辩论等)。也照亮了更深层次的艺术和自然科学中的争论。例如：舍勒斯对纯粹移情的伦理学的有效批判，以及与哲学、心理学和社会学中的情感理论的历史批判联系；不仅包含理性而且包含爱的人的概念的发展；人类学、形而上学和伦理学之间的联系，提供了现象学方法的视角。除了同时期的《舍勒的形式主义》和《舍勒的物质论》之外，《同情的伪善》是20世纪哲学和跨学科论战的另一部重要著作。到目前为止，可用的社论是不可靠的，没有提到1913年和1926年第一版和第二版之间的区别。也缺乏对实际版本中书目参考文献是否不完整或虚假的核实。为了纠正这些错误并标记其他人的干预，这将是该版本的进一步任务。

The edition of Max Schelers Wesen und Formen der Sympathie aspires to a critical publication of this text. On the basis of such an edition it will be possible to connect this text in an adequate way to the history of philosophy as well to systematic of philosophical investigation. Furthermore the current discussion about the philosophy of feelings, to which just this work is important, will get a reliable foundation. Therefore the research discussions about Max Scheler as well as the interdisciplinary field of research in actual debates fall back on an edition, which is philological and scientific assured, but missed thus far. Focussing on Schelers Wesen und Formen der Sympathie this is a desideratum, because of the considerable differences between the first edition in 1913 and the second one in 1923. Obviously this is shown in the enlargement of the scope: the first edition contains 153 pages, the second one contains 307 pages. Most interesting in a systematic way Schelers phenomenological work about manifestations of the feelings of sympathy and their relevance for moral and therefore successfull self-manifestation in the background of divergent forms of sociality takes part in actual discussions in philosophy (e.g. debates about collective intentionality, about shared feelings etc.) and illuminates debates in the further arts and natural sciences as well. For example: Schelers effective critique of an ethic of pure empathy and the historico-critical connection to theories of emotion in philosophy, psychology, and sociology; the developing of a concept of person containing not only reason but also love; the connection between anthropology, metaphysics, and ethics, providing the perspective of phenomenological method. Beside Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik of Scheler, which was written in the same period, Wesen und Formen der Sympathie can be seen as a further main work, being fundamental for 20th century philosophy and the interdisciplinary debates. The editons available so far are unreliable and do not mention the differences between the first and the second edition in 1913 and 1926. There also is a lack about the verification of bibliographical references in the actual editions being incomplete or false thus way. To correct these errors and to mark interventions by others it will be a further task of the edition.