Overcoming borders. Legal categorisation of gender, “race” and class in transnational labour conflicts

就业的法律的规定与集体代表的结构密切相关。这些是主要由国家组织的结构和行动形式。这就是为什么我们假设跨国劳工冲突中的集体行动（主要由倡导网络组织）与一种非常具体的法律化一起工作：它可以在集体行动和集体权利与个人人权和反歧视权利的概念对比中进行分析。 根据两种现象-工人沿着跨国价值链的集体组织和德国的移徙工人集体组织-本项目在第二个供资期审查工会、非政府组织和其他民间社会行为体等跨国行为体如何利用法律的类别，特别是“性别”、“种族”和阶级类别，以及如何利用个人权利进行集体化。我们认为，在跨界冲突中组织集体行动比在国家范围内组织集体行动更困难，因此往往利用个人权利，特别是人权。在这种背景下，我们要问，正在阐述什么样的跨界团结和代表性的想法。在第一个供资期的研究基础上，将编写关于“集体/个人权利”之间关系的概念说明。

The legal regulation of employment is closely linked to structures of collective representation. These are structures and forms of action that are predominantly organized nationally. This is why we assume that collective action in transnational labour conflicts (which is predominantly organized by advocacy networks) works with a very specific kind of juridification: It can be analysed in a conceptual contrast of collective action and collective rights to individual human rights and anti-discrimination rights. Based on two phenomena--the collective organization of workers along transnational value chains and the collective organization of migrant workers in Germany--this project, in the second funding period, examines the way in which transnational actors such as trade unions, NGOs and other civil society actors utilize legal categories, especially that of “gender”, “race” and class, and how individual rights are used for collectivization. We assume that collective action is more difficult to organize in cross-border conflicts than in the national context and therefore often draws on individual rights, in particular human rights. Against this background we ask, what ideas of cross-border solidarity but also of representation are being articulated. On the basis of research from the first funding period, conceptual statements on the relationship between “the collective / individual rights” will be developed.