Invective asymmetrization. Diatribe duels in Italian and German Humanism (D)

“人文主义”意味着什么，谁属于“人文主义者”这一群体，尤其是在抨击的媒介中得到了澄清。该研究项目询问了一种精心制作的谩骂语言作为一种社会独特特征或象征资本的方面，在这种语言的帮助下，某些人和群体成功地实现了与对手的不对称，例如，对手被贬低为“野蛮人”或“学者”，因此被排除在认可的圈子之外。研究的重点是弗朗西斯科·彼得拉卡、雅各布·温普费林和Reuchlin争议。

What ‘humanism’ means and who belongs to the group of ‘humanists’ was clarified not least in the medium of invectivity. The research project asks about the aspect of an elaborate invective language as a social distinctive feature or symbolic capital, with the help of which certain people and groups succeeded in achieving an asymmetry vis-à-vis opponents, who are disparaged, for example, as ‘barbarians’ or ‘scholastics’ and thus pushed out of the circle of recognition. The study is focused on the example of Francesco Petrarca, Jakob Wimpfeling and the Reuchlin controversy.