Geschlechtliche Ambiguität in der Medienberichterstattung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von den 1970er Jahren bis zur Jahrtausendwende

该项目考察了从20世纪70年代到千年之交，德意志联邦共和国的媒体是如何看待性别模糊的。这种模棱两可的现象可以分为双性变种、易装癖和变性人。双性变异通常被认为与自然有关，而易装癖和变性人则被归因于相关人的自由意志：这种分类引发了一种比较的视角。媒体分析包括重要的和受欢迎的印刷媒体以及广播和电视。该分项目侧重于关于医学(包括精神病学和心理学)、法律和体育领域的公开辩论。这是因为性别歧视在每一种情况下都发挥着至关重要的作用：在医学领域，性别归属源于身体和精神类别，而医学科学家甚至能够进行性别重新分配。法律领域涉及婚姻状况、婚姻状况的变化及其后果。在体育领域，比赛是按性别差异划分的。此外，通过对运动员的身体/身体进行富有表现力的关注，突出了性别联系。该分项目从历时的角度审视了德国辩论是否存在“美国化”的问题，以及辩论的强度和时间间隔。通过这样做，该项目打算将1980年变性法律之前的讨论与即将到来的美美性别研究联系起来，后者强调对性别从属关系的更具建构主义的看法，因为

The project examines how media perceived gender ambiguity in the Federal Republic of Germany from the 1970s till the turn of the millennium. This ambiguity can be divided into intersex variations, transvestism and transsexuality. Intersex variations are usually seen as linked to nature, while transvestism and transsexuality are attributed to the free will of the concerned persons: this classification is provoking a comparative perspective. Media analysis includes significant and popular printed media as well as radio broadcasting and television. The subproject focuses on public debates about the fields of medicine (including psychiatry and psychology), law and sports. That is because gender distinction plays an essential role in each case: in the field of medicine gender affiliation is derived from physical and mental categories while medical scientists are even able to conduct gender reassignments. The field of law is concerned with marital status, its changings and consequences. In the field of sports competitions are divided by gender distinctions. In addition gender affiliation is highlighted by an expressive focus on the body/physicalness of the athletes. In a diachronic perspective the subproject examines the question whether there was an "americanization" of the German debate and in which intensity and temporal intervals it occured. In doing so the project intends to connect discussions before the transsexual-law of 1980 with the upcoming of the US-American Gender Studies which emphasize a more constructivist perception of gender affiliation since the