A study of Epicurus' fragments and doxographies on his philosophy

本研究的目的之一是要厘清伊壁鸠鲁是否主张两种神。首先，我将通过伊壁鸠鲁本人，他的弟子和学者们的著作，来考察学者们关于第一主要学说的陈述和西塞罗的《自然之道》的描述之间的关系。然后我猜想西塞罗稍微扭曲了伊壁鸠鲁的神论的意图，因为他在n.d的一段话中强调了神的结构的柔软性，并强调了伊壁鸠鲁的神。因此我确定伊壁鸠鲁承认两种神，即居住在“intermundia”中的不朽坏的神是伊壁多拉的起源，而伊壁鸠鲁的神是由他们衍生出来的，尽管他们的物质由精细的原子组成。本研究的另一个目的是研究伊壁鸠鲁的哲学片段和遗作，并将其翻译成日文，并附有注释。本文描述了fr7 -25 （Arrighetti）的翻译，并对《Usener， Epicurea》中的片段与《Arrighetti， Epicuro Opere》中的片段进行了对比。

An aim of this study is to make clear whether or not Epicurus maintained two kinds of the gods.At first I examine a relationship between the statement of the scholiast on the first of Principal Doctrines and the description of Cicero' De natura deorum I especially, by utilizing the writings of Epicurus himself, his disciples and the doxoraphers.Then I guess that Cicero distorted slightly the intention of Epicurus' doctrine of the gods, because he weighted the softness of structure of gods and emphasized the eidola-gods in a passage of N.D.Consequently I determine that Epicurus admitted two kinds of the gods, that is, the incorruptible gods dwelling in 'intermundia' as the origin of eidola and the eidola-gods as the derivative from them, although their substance consists of fine atoms.Another aim of this study is to examine Epicurus' fragments and doxographies on his philosophy and to translate them into Japanese with commentaries. In this report the translations of Fr.7-25 (Arrighetti) and the list contrasting between the fragments in Usener, Epicurea and the fragments in Arrighetti, Epicuro Opere are described.