Developing Evaluation Criteria to Assess the Internationalization of Universities

在2005年赴美国、欧洲等国外调研的基础上，我们又在国内进行了多次调研和学习。通过这种方式，我们促进了我们的研究，使各个大学评估其国际化的进展，并记住这是用于自我改进;我们制定了以下评价指标。首先，我们制定了适合日本大学行政和组织结构的评价指标和指南，参考了“活动类别”和“观点”，2003年，国立大学学位与大学评估研究所为评估国立大学的“国际联系与学术交流活动”而进行的评估活动中，采用了这些评估活动，以审查评估指标以及国际化程度。IQR、ACE指南和Michael Page的绩效指标。 ...更多信息 以图表形式排列“项目、分项和分项”、“评价的目标和挑战”、“待调查”、“监测和分析技术”、“评价指标”和“指导方针”。评价指标由8个项目组成，包括：1.大学的使命，目标和计划2.结构和人员3.宣传和实施4.研究活动的国际化5.支持系统，信息提供和基础设施6.国际关系和学校的多方面促进7.大学学校的国际化8.与外部组织的联合项目以及23个分项和49个分项。制定这些评价指标时考虑到了大学的基础、规模、特点和其他方面的理念以及“国际化”的各种概念，因此，每所大学都能够从指标的各个项目中选择和使用适合自己目标的项目，这是一个所谓的点菜式指标菜单。在大坂大学，我们使用这些评价指标进行了实验研究。少

Based on the overseas research in the United States, Europe in 2005, we had several times of domestic research and study sessions. In such ways, we have promoted our research, so that individual universities evaluate their progress about internationalization, and bearing in mind that this is to be used for self-improvement; we developed evaluation indicators as below.First of all, we developed evaluation indicators and guidelines to suit Japanese universities in terms of their administration and organizational structures, referring to "Activity Category" and "Viewpoint", which are adopted in the evaluation activities for assessing "International Affiliation and Academic Exchange Activities" in national universities that are conducted by National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation in 2003 to review the evaluation indicators as well as the Internationalization. Performance Indicators by the IQR,ACE guidelines, and Michael Page.The draft of the evaluation indicator … More s are arranged "Item, Sub-item and Sub-sub-item," "Objective and challenge of evaluation," "To be surveyed," "Techniques of surveillance and analysis," "Evaluation indicator," and "Guidelines" in chart form. Evaluation indicator made up from 8 items consists of other than the curriculums :1.Mission, goals and plans of the university2.Structure and staff3.Budgeting and implementation4.International dimension of research activities5.A support system, information provision and infrastructure6.Multifaceted promotion of international affiliationand curriculums :7.Internationalization of the university curriculum8.Joint programs with external organizationsand 23 sub-items and 49 sub-sub-items. These developed evaluation indicators were prepared to take into consideration philosophies of foundation, sizes, features and other aspects of universities, as well as diverse concepts of "internationalization", so that each university is able to select and use only the items suitable for its own objectives from the various items of the indicators, representing a so-called a la carte menu of indicators. In Osaka University, we investigated using these evaluation indicators experimentally. Less