Canon law and attempts on ecclesiastical reform within the change of the Merovingien and Carolingian realm: The Collectio Vetus gallica and it's context within manuscript tradition.

该项目的主要主题是法兰西最早的系统性经典收藏：Collectio Vetus Gallica。这个集合是通过只有在一个版本编辑在修道院的科尔比在第二季度的第8世纪。这个版本是由休伯特·莫德克第一次严格编辑的，被认为是与宫殿的君士坦丁堡市长有关的教会改革的早期证据。该项目于2001年7月启动。2021年，专注于几个文本与收集在不同的组成和手稿传统的装饰。因此，四个不同层次的调查已被界定：第一个层次是关于这些文本的内容的连贯性。特别值得注意的是，大量的文本连接到教皇的权威。在第二个层次上，文本和历史背景下的传输问题进行检查和澄清，同时准备的基础上Vetus Gallica传统，这还没有被演绎编辑迄今关键版本。同时，整个传输复杂的后效和收集的接收也进行了检查。在第三个层次上，通过检查的文本和历史背景下的传输提供的结果相结合，莫德克的结果，重新思考他在两个手稿类的分化。在这方面，主要的重点在于基于这两个类之间的差异有关的内容，知识的来源和编辑的动机相互比较和假设的Corbie收集的编辑的问题。另一种假设是，有可能解释传统中的差异是同一地点和同一时间的不同编辑过程的结果。这些分析的结果汇集在第四个层次，以背景下的传输复杂和它的四个阶段的编辑和它的接收更准确地在早期奥古斯丁的改革。请求延长该项目的期限是为了能够在对手稿传输和编辑进行更详细的批判性分析时纳入更多的文本，以便在更有价值的基础上确保和具体说明以前的结果。尤其是格里高利一世的主教会议。595和他的讨论和最近编辑的“Libellus Responsionum”以及Paenitentiale Remense，这是特别有趣的编辑，接待和历史背景方面，是相当大的这种分析。

Main subject of the project is the earliest systematic canonical collection in the Francia: The Collectio Vetus Gallica. This collection is passed on only in a version redacted in the monastery of Corbie in the second quarter of the 8th century. This version was critically edited by Hubert Mordek for the first time and was valued as early evidence of ecclesiastical reforms connected to the Carolingian mayors of the palace. This project, that started on July 01. 2021, is focussing on several texts associated with the collection in different compositions and consistencies in the manuscript tradition. Thus four different levels of investigation have been defined: The first level is about the coherence of the content of these texts. Special attention is drawn to an amount of texts connected to papal authority. On the second level, questions of textual and historical contexts of transmission are examined and clarified alongside the preparation of critical editions based on the Vetus Gallica tradition, which have not been deduced editorially so far. Simultaneously the aftereffects of the entire transmission complex and the reception of the collection are also examined. On the third level the results provided by the examination of the textual and historical contexts of transmission are combined with Mordek’s results to rethink his differentiation in two manuscript classes. In this regard the main focus lies on the questions based on the differences between those two classes concerning content, knowledge of the sources and the redactors’ motivations compared to each other and the assumed redaction of the collection in Corbie. An alternate assumption is the possibility explaining the differences in the tradition as a result of a differentiated editing process at the same place and at the same time. The results of those analyses are brought together on the fourth level in order to contextualize the transmission complex and its four stages of redactions and its reception more precisely within the early Carolingian reforms. The requested extension of the project is intended to make it possible to include further texts in a more detailed critical analysis of manuscript transmission and editing in order to secure and specify the previous results on a more valuable basis. Especially the Synod of Gregory I. of 595 and his much discussed and lately edited “Libellus Responsionum” as well as the Paenitentiale Remense, which is particularly interesting in terms of its editing, reception and historical context, are considerable for this analysis.