The Research of the Discussion about the Economization of the public Administrations

本研究的目的在于从法理学的角度确认新福利经济学，特别是新制度经济学对法理学和政策制定的意义和有效范围。在日本行政法学界，还没有对行政法的这一问题进行研究。在这项研究中，我主要研究了两个领域。第一本是铃村光太郎教授的研究生院用微观经济学教科书，内容涉及效率与公平、福利经济学与社会选择、个人权利与社会选择的关系。我的结论是，一个规范的经济学，它试图为社会条件提出适当的建议，正如铃村教授所坚持的那样，必须考虑各种各样的其他信息，而不是有效性。G.个人的缺陷，社会条件的绝对健康。判例也考虑到了这一信息。因此，从政策制定的角度来看，保持法学与微观经济学之间的对话是非常重要的。我计划在此基础上，发表一篇关于德国公共行政节约的论文。G.我的第二个研究领域，与我研究的主题相似。

The Purpose of this research is to confirm the significance and the effective range of the new welfare economics, especially of the new institutional school of economics for the jurisprudence and policy-making in view of the jurisprudence. There has been no such study in the field of the administrative Law in Japan. In this study I have researched two main fields. The first is these Professor Kotaro Suzumura's textbook about the micro economics for the Students of the Graduate Schools, which deals with the relationships between the effectiveness and the equity, welfare economics and social choice, and Individual Rights and Social choice. I concluded that a normative economic, which attempts to the adequate proposal for social conditions, as Professor Suzumura duly insisted, must take accounting of the variety of other information than the effectiveness, e. g. handicaps of individuals, the definitive wellness of the social conditions. And the jurisprudence has taken account of this information. It is therefore very important for us to maintain the dialogue between the jurisprudence and the micro economics in view of the policy-making. I have a plan, to publish a on the basis of this research the paper about that discussions about that economizing of the public administrations in Germany, e. g. my second research field, which deal with the subject similar to that of my study.