The Relationship between Tradition and Scripture in the Work of Wolfhart Pannenberg and Walter Kasper

基于路德派神学家Wolfhart Pannenberg和罗马天主教神学家Walter Kasper的神学，这项研究详细介绍了这两种神学方法如何从各自的宗教背景中努力更新对圣经和传统的理解，最终达到他们理解的趋同。与诉诸圣经或传统，都强调继承到现在，其中，在同一时间，包含一个不连续的时刻传统的现实化。因此，传统不是传统主义。基于这两种方法，对传统的理解是勾勒参考的背景下，传统的出现，同时也考虑到新的，当代现实化的传统。这项研究填补了一个研究空白，因为到目前为止还没有对Pannenberg和Kasper进行比较研究。对潘嫩贝格或卡斯珀的集中研究只对圣经或传统的理解有一个折衷的重点，而没有详细阐述启示，圣经，传统和解释学的整个背景，并参考进一步的神学和哲学基础。通过这两位神学家的研究，可以看出路德-罗马天主教的对话已经在圣经与传统的关系上达成了有效的趋同。作为一个比较研究，从新教的角度在一个普世的视野，它不仅突出了潘嫩伯格和卡斯珀如何描述圣经和传统之间的关系，但也侧重于如何执行相关的解释程序在他们的神学论证。在这个过程中，很明显，尽管在他们对这种关系的描述中发现了这种近似，但忏悔和知识传统支配着他们的框架。在其他研究项目中，这种关系的描述和神学论证之间的关联尚未得到，这表明本研究的原创性。本文在全面阐述《圣经》与传统关系的基础上，试图勾勒出一个在新教神学中被忽视的“传统”概念。在这样做的时候，参考圣经，作为新教的“唯独圣经”成立，是没有放弃。基督教传统的过程中的各种动态和方面被认为是。这两个神学家理解传统作为一个动态的，pneumatological过程中，神圣的真理揭示自己新的。这不是一个保存传承传统的问题，而是一个重新利用传统，从而通过传统改造现在的问题。因此，传统意味着一个传播的过程，这个过程也总是一个认识的过程，因为历史的传播过程本身对于上帝在历史中的启示的发展具有认识论的功能。因此，传统--作为圣经--必须在基础神学中得到反思。

Based on the theology of the Lutheran Theologian Wolfhart Pannenberg and the Roman Catholic theologian Walter Kasper, the study details how both theological approaches grapple from within their own denominational contexts for a renewal of the understanding of Scripture and tradition, in the end arriving at a convergence in their understanding. With recourse to Scripture or tradition, both emphasize the actualization of the inherited tradition into the present, which, at the same time, contains a moment of discontinuity. Thus, tradition is not traditionalism. Based on the two approaches, an understanding of tradition is sketched with reference to the context of the emergence of tradition while also considering the new, contemporary actualization of tradition. The study fills a research gap, since so far there is no comparative study on Pannenberg and Kasper. Focused studies on Pannenberg or Kasper have only had an eclectic focus on the understanding of Scripture or tradition, without elaborating the entire context of revelation, Scripture, tradition, and hermeneutics with reference to further theological and philosophical foundations. Through the two theologians, the study can show that the Lutheran-Roman Catholic dialogue has come to an effective convergence regarding the relationship of Scripture and tradition. As a comparative study from a Protestant perspective within an ecumenical horizon, it not only highlights how Pannenberg and Kasper describe the relationship between Scripture and tradition, but also focuses on how both implement the associated hermeneutical program in their theological argumentation. In this process, it becomes apparent that the confessional and intellectual traditions govern their framework despite such approximation found in their descriptions of the relationship. In other research projects, such correlation between the description of the relationship and the theological argumentation has not yet been made, indicating the originality of this study. Based on the comprehensive elaboration of the relationship between Scripture and tradition, the study aims to profile a concept of "tradition," which has been neglected in Protestant theology. In so doing, the reference to the bible, as founded by the Protestant "sola scriptura," is not abandoned. The various dynamics and aspects of the process of Christian tradition are considered. Both theologians understand tradition as a dynamic, pneumatological process where divine truth reveals itself anew. lt is not so much a matter of preserving transmitted traditions; rather it is about reappropriating them and thereby transforming the present through tradition. Tradition thus means a process of transmission that is always also a process of cognition, since the historical processes of transmission themselves have an epistemological function for the development of the revelation of God in history. Therefore, tradition - as Scripture - must be reflected upon in fundamental theology.