A Follow-up Survey of Coping with the New National Course of Study

我们根据董事会调查的结果进行了学校调查，我们将董事会调查的回应分为5种模式，学校调查包括学校现场调查(一所学校)和教师调查(一所学校六个)，前者包括调查课程制定过程的问题。后者包括调查对每个学校的课程和组织氛围的意见的问题。本研究发现：(1)对董事会调查的回应进行量化分析，提取了董事会意愿和董事会意图-学校意愿。聚类分析将董事会的反应分为5种类型。(2)教育董事会重视绝对项目，而学校重视具体项目。(3)指导董事会对学校的影响是基本原则。(4)教师倾向于将其视为一个重要的绝对项目。(5)时间的分配和选课的调整被认为是问题。但教师往往把与新课程理念的契合视为烦恼。

We carried out school surveys based upon a result of board surveys, We classified board survey respones into 5 patterns, School surveys consisted of school-site survey (one & school) and teacher survey(six a school), The former includes questions which investigate process of making curriculum. The latters includes questions which investigate opinions to curriculums and organizational climate of each school. This study found(1) Analyzing responses of board survey by quantifying-III extracted "aotivity" and "board intention-school intention". Cluster analysis classified board responces into 5 patterns.(2) Boards of aducation regard absolute items as an important, But in school they regard concrete items as an important.(3) Guidance of boards influent on schools as a fundamental principles. But they are apt to create curriculum based on precedents.(4) Teachers are apt to regard as an important absolute items.(5) Sharing of time and adjustment of selected subject are thought of as problems. But teachers tend to regard conformity to philosophy of new course of study as troubles.