THE HISTORIOAL RESEARCH ON THE HAN * CONFUCIANISM

本文对三年的研究成果进行了总结：董宗书的再考***（二）《盐汉之争》基础研究。三、对班儒及其著作《汉书》的再认识。首先，研究者对董氏给武帝的奏折进行了考证，并通过还原汉代公文的形式，认为《杜氏》的全部内容都不可能是董氏的原创奏折。同时，通过对《史记》和《汉书》中董氏的两篇不同的传记进行了比较，对董氏为儒家学说的确立做出了巨大贡献的标准观点提出了质疑。其次，通过分析《盐铁论》记载的讨论，研究者认为这一来源反映了当时分别属于“内”和“外”朝廷的官员之间的政治斗争，以及儒家和法家两大思想集团之间的思想冲突。由此得出结论：儒学的胜利和法家的失败，为确立儒学为国家思想迈出了第一步。研究者澄清，《汉书》作者的个人信仰由四部分组成(1)。汉朝是尧的后裔。汉代的特点是“火元素**”，(3)左桓，“**”，(4)微语**。他断言，所有这些观点都是在前汉末期形成并盛行的。从这个角度出发，他得出结论，关于儒学的著名和公认的观点是“错误的”，班布根据他的不同寻常的和非正统的观点编写了汉书。

The results of reseach corried out for three years are summerized as follws.I. The reexamination of Dong Znorgshu *** II The fundamental studies on yontie-lun *** (Debates on Salt and Han). III The reonsideration of Ban (Ru ** ord his book, Han-shu (The History of the Former Han).First, the investigater inquires into Dong's memorials to the Emperor Wu and,through restoring the forms of official documents of Han times, he orgues that the whole parts of Duice ** can not De regarded as his origical memorials, At the same time, after attempting to compare the two different biographies of Dong in Shiji ** and Han-shu, no idoubts that the standard opinion which syas that Dong contributed greatly the establishment of confucianism as a state doctrine.Second, by analizing the disussions recorded in Yantie-lun, the investigator argues that this source reflects the political struggle between the officials belonging to the "Inner" and "Outer" court of the day respectively and the intellectual conflict between the two groups of thought, confucionism and Legalism. Consequently he comes to a conclusion that the viotory of confucianism and defeat of Legalism result in makine the first step toward the foundation of confucianism as the national thought.Third. The investigator clarifies that the outhor of Han-shu owes his own personal beliefs consisted of four phroses, (1). The Han dynasty descended from Yao, (2). The Han dynasty is characterized by the"Fire Element **", (3) Zuoghuan,"**", (4) Weishyu **. And he asserted that all of these views formed and prevailed during the days of the end of the Former Han. From this point of view, he concludes, that the famous and accepted opinion about the Hon Confuiclanism is "falsed" by Ban Bu who compiled Han-shu based on his unustual and unorthodoxical views above mentioned.