Research on the Tradition of Nature-God Thought in the modern History of religious ideas

自然神的概念包含着以自然为本质特征的神性概念。在这项研究中，我主要追溯了德国传统中自然神观念的历史发展。作为研究的结果，我确定了这样一个事实，即除了自然主义世俗意义上的自然现实化之外，过去和现在都存在着一种思想传统，可以称之为现代的“自然救赎论”。自然观念不仅作为一种批判工具，反对启示的教条或反对现代社会/文化，但它也获得了一种救赎论的基调，承诺通过自然生命能量的复苏，一个永恒的超越。在研究过程中，笔者将五个主题作为讨论的重点：（1）救赎论本质在近代早期自然神秘主义中的现实化，（2）德国罗马主义中古代泛理性主义的恢复，（3）19、20世纪反基督教的“voelkisch”宗教运动中的自然神与自然救赎论，（4）19、20世纪反基督教的“voelkisch“宗教运动中的自然神与自然救赎论，（5）19、20世纪反基督教的“voelkisch“宗教运动中的自然神与自然救赎论，（6）19、20世纪反基督教的”voelkisch“宗教运动中的自然神与自然救赎论。（4）海克尔自然科学思想及其一元论运动中对内在自然的悖论性超越：（4）阿多诺、贝弗罗批判理论中的自然是“不同一的”及其救赎论意蕴。

The concept of nature-god implies the concept of the Godhood which comprises the natural as its own essencial characteristic. In this research I traceed the historical development of the idea of nature-god chiefly in German tradition. As a result of the research I ascertained the fact that beside the actualization of the natural in the naturalistic-secular sense there was and is a tradition of thought which can be called the "nature-soteriology" in the modern era. The idea of nature functioned not only as a critical tool agaist the dogma of revelation or against the modern society/culture, but it also acquired a sort of soteriological tone which promised an immanent transcendence through the resustitation of natural life-energy. In my research I thematized 5 topics as focal points of discussion : 1) actualization of the soteriological nature in the early modern nature-mysticism ; 2) the restoration of ancient panphysisism in the German roman ticism ; 3) nature-god and nature-soteriology in the anti-christian "voelkisch"religious movements in the 19th and the 20th centuries ; 4) the paradoxical transcendence of immanet nature in the Haeckelian idea of natural science and his Monistic Movement ; 4) the nature as "the not-identical" and its soteriological implication in the critical theory of Adorno and Bejamin.