An international and positive research for the role of human resource formation by universities and enterprises in the process of technological development.

这证实了大学不仅是人力资源的来源，而且是人力网络的中心。为了技术的发展，大学必须加强其研究和教育能力，即使预算很低，大学的功能作用，如网络，仍然会变得重要。从法日技术发展人力资源开发的比较研究中，我们可以得到两个启示。一是人力资本形成需要与技术发展战略相协调的全局观和战略观。特别是在高技术和城市发展技术领域，有必要加大对选定项目的资源投入。正如我们在本文中所看到的，法国体系更适合这种类型的技术发展。第二个含义是政府应该提供精确和有组织的教育背景和职业资格体系，并与社会和商业组织建立更紧密的联系。这可能成为在外部劳动力市场寻找新工作的工人的人力资本投资的市场。日本的内部晋升制度非常有效，为员工提供了指导，这是下一步应该学习的。它很好地保证了工人在国内劳动力市场中受雇时能够获得人力资本投资的回报。然而，在新的条件下，日本劳动力市场产生了更多的不稳定就业，以应对不稳定的经济条件。特别是，法国和日本的差异来自于培训和晋升制度，也来自于高等教育制度。具有象征意义的问题是，法国独特的统计概念“社会职业类别”，这是某种社会阶层和职业的结合。本研究项目的初步结论是，法国和日本人力资源形成的许多事实是在教育制度、培训制度、企业内部组织、劳资关系和社会保障制度等条件下的个人决策的混合。我们需要更多的调查，更多的数据和更复杂的比较研究框架。然而，我们的研究表明，在这种社会经济制度的国际比较研究工作下，我们可以期待更有效的政策启示。少

It is confirmed that university does not only works as the source of human resource, but as the center of human network. University must do power up its research and education capability for technological development, even though the budget is low, functional role of university like networking will still become important.There are two implications we can get from this study of French-Japan comparison of human resource development for technological development.One is the need for total and strategic view of human capital formation in coordination with the strategy for technological development. Especially for the high-technology and urban development technology fields, it is necessary to intensify the resources into selected projects. As we have seen in this paper, French system is more suitable for this type of technological development.The second implication is that the government should offer precise and organized system of educational background and occupational qualifications with … More more closer links to social and business organizations. This may become the tragets of human capital investment for workers looking for new jobs in the external labor market. The Japanese internal promotion system worked very well for giving guideline to workers which should be learned next. And it worked very well for guaranteeing the workers to collect their returns to his human capital investment as far as they are employed in the some internal labor market. However, under the new condition of Japanese labor market which creates more unstable employment to cope with unstable economic conditions.Especially, the difference between France and Japan comes from the training and promotion system, and also comes from the system of higher education. The symbolic matter is that the unique statistical idea of "social professional category" for France, which is some sort of combination of social class and occupation.Our tentative conclusion of this research project is that the many facts on human resource formation in both France and Japan is the mixture of individual decision making under the condition of educational system, training system, internal organization of enterprises, industrial relations and social security system.We need more investigation with more data and more sophisticated framework for comparative research. However, our research had shown that we can expect more efficient policy implications under this kind of international comparative research work of social and economic system. Less