The Study on feudal law of Jacques Cujas and the Customs, Ordinances and Jurisprudences in the latter sixteenth-century-France

从2000年开始，我继续进行了三年的研究。在我的研究报告中，我试图调查《民法大全》的两个修订版（编辑，作者：L. Brachard和L.Le Caron）。在当时，它包括“Liber feudorum”，拜占庭宪法，神圣罗马宪法后的来源“Novellae”，“Authenticae”。首先，我研究了法学家雅克Cujas和他的作品，特别是他的“Observationes et Emendationes（1556-1596）"。这表明，他使用自己的方法，从早期的各种法律的来源，他没有系统的意图。并将他对罗马法的研究与他对封建法的研究相比较第二部分，笔者继续考察了1510年巴黎的“Coutumier（修订版1580年），法国国王的“Ordonnance”在十六世纪后期，和“Parlement”的巴黎和图卢兹在16世纪和17世纪初的prudences。然后，他把每一个历史来源放在每一个历史阶段。这种历史的分析方法为研究本世纪乃至下一世纪的法律与制度史提供了一种新的方法。最后，笔者考察了对“留斯蒂尼制度”的评论与16、17和18世纪初法国法律建设的关系。笔者认为，从法律的人文主义到法国民法典，都有学院式的传统。

I have continued this research for three years from 2000. In my research report, I tried to investigate two revisions of "Corpus Iuris Civilis" (ed., by L.Roussard and L.Le Caron). At that time, it included "Liber feudorum", Byzantine constitutions, and Holy Roman constitutions after the sources of "Novellae", "Authenticae".In the first place, I examined into the jurist Jacques Cujas and his works, particularly his "Observationes et Emendationes (1556-1596)". And it makes clear that he used his own approach to various legal sources from early period and he had no systematic intention. And, to compare his study on Roman law with his study on feudal law (or customary law), I tried to investigate on the "Consuetudines Tolosae" and more ancient custom, "Liber feudorum".In the second, I continued to investigate on the "Coutumier" of Paris at 1510 (revised edition 1580), French king's "Ordonnance" in the latter sixteenth-century, and jurisprudences of "Parlement" of Paris and Toulouse in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. Then He placed each historical source into each historical stage. This historical approach to analyze brought out a new method to study a history of law and institution in this century and the next.Finally, I examined into the relation between commentary on the "Iustiniani Institutiones" and construction of French law in the sixteenth, seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. I think that there is a tradition of Institute style from the legal humanism to the French civil code.